User talk:Monkeynipple

Hello, I'm NawlinWiki. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Drosera peruensis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! NawlinWiki (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mustang horse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —SMALL JIM 17:05, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to William III of England with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipelli ^Talk 17:10, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine was changed by Monkeynipple (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957206 on 2014-05-30T17:11:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SMALL JIM 17:14, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]