User talk:MongolWiki
|
Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:08, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi MongolWiki! According to your contributions I find you probably have knowledge about Mongolian history. But please also note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not really a fan site; we should try to hold a Neutral point of view (as mentioned in the welcome template above) and worldwide view (instead of local [e.g. Mongolian] view). People who have knowledge about certain subject may also try to help maintain the quality of related pages according to the guideline of Wikipedia and help solve problems. Thanks! --173.206.65.134 (talk) 22:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You are right that it should reflect the "worldwide view instead of Mongolian view". But please give an example of MongolWiki's "Mongolian views" which could not be accepted. Basically I thought that the "worldwide view" is made up of many different views including "Mongolian", "Russian", "American", "Japanese", etc. and exits on their balance. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks! Gantuya eng (talk) 03:16, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi Gantuya eng, have not seen you for some time. But he probably knows what I mean. In fact, just see what the name "MongolWiki" stands for. He (including when he edited as IP users) for example made massive changes of templates, such as in Zunghar Khanate. I have not undone or changed any of them, but just a quick and friendly note to him that it's better not to make such large-scale changes in articles without proper discussions. --173.206.65.134 (talk) 01:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, everyone. Thanks for your suggestion. I think I understand you told me. MongolWiki (talk)
- Hi Gantuya eng, have not seen you for some time. But he probably knows what I mean. In fact, just see what the name "MongolWiki" stands for. He (including when he edited as IP users) for example made massive changes of templates, such as in Zunghar Khanate. I have not undone or changed any of them, but just a quick and friendly note to him that it's better not to make such large-scale changes in articles without proper discussions. --173.206.65.134 (talk) 01:23, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Hi MongolWiki. Can I ask you a guestion ? Do you know pricise and common name of Category:Descendants of Jochi (Shiban & Toqa Temur) ? Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 21:45, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Ok, I have understand it. Thanks for you --MongolWiki (talk) 04:19, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- That was a software (...bot) that left a message for you. You don't need to reply to it. Gantuya eng (talk) 11:46, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
Naming conventions
[edit]Stop moving pages around! You have started a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Mongolian), and there is no consensus at English Wikipedia to use MNS 5217:2003; until changed by consensus, “Naming conventions (Mongolian)” is what you are to follow! G Purevdorj (talk) 10:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Moreover, you have no right to replace Middle Mongolian, Inner Mongolian or other non-Khalkha forms with their Khalkha equivalents! G Purevdorj (talk) 10:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- I left a comment in duscussion page. --MongolWiki (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- I told you to stop moving if you don't have consense and contravene the guidelines that have been made before. You cannot just treat transcription systems at wikipedia as your personal playground! G Purevdorj (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Well, it appears you have reneged on o and u, but continued with kh > h. I might be able to live with that, and as nobody else joined into any discussion ... Still, please be consistent: you renamed a page to Monkh Saridag, which should be Mönh Saridag then. And you were even less consistent with poor Mönkh Khairkhan > Mönkh Hairhan: if you replace kh in male words, you surely must do so also in female words. G Purevdorj (talk) 10:31, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I told you to stop moving if you don't have consense and contravene the guidelines that have been made before. You cannot just treat transcription systems at wikipedia as your personal playground! G Purevdorj (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- I left a comment in duscussion page. --MongolWiki (talk) 11:33, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Bat Khan Mountain--It would be great if you could also Wikify the related article Tavan Bogd Uul.
Jipinghe (talk) 17:00, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
Rouran
[edit]Hi, MongolWiki. Do you know common name of this article ? Takabeg (talk) 03:16, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, I think study of Mongolian history is continuing in Mongolia. In, 2000, used term Jou-jan, since 2005, use name Nirun. Nirun (in Modern Mongolian Нуруу) is means "human's back", because it is described in "Legend of the Ergune Khun" (Эргүнэ-Хуны домог).--MongolWiki (talk) 03:42, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
- Chinese character transcriptions such as Juan-juan, ruan-ruan don't represent truly names. Because they divide have two or three side one name. Example, How can people understand Meng-gu is Mongol, if they known chinese transcription?--MongolWiki (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to article Greater Mongolia Gantuya eng (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
Khalkhyn Gol
[edit]You have previously moved the article on Khalkhyn Gol. The article has been proposed for moving again, see Talk:Halh River#Requested move (again). --Stefan2 (talk) 15:23, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Consesnsus principle
[edit]This Wikipedia is based on a consensus principle, the naming conventions is one of this consensuses. But you, dear MongolWiki, concentrated renaming activity based on your personal decision of a different transliteration algorythm using. It will be better decision to discuss this kind of decisions with your collegues in Wikipedia, I guess. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:44, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
'Mongol' instead of 'Mongolian language'
[edit]You've made several edits replacing 'Mongolian language' with 'Mongol'. You didn't made any comments with your motivations explanation. So what was your idea? And why you didn't discuss it with your collegues wikipedians? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Calligraphy
[edit]It seems you're interested in calligraphy. I'm planning to create an article on Mongolian Calligraphy when I have time. Please help. Even you can create an article on Mongolian Calligraphy and then I can see whether I could add something. Gantuya eng (talk) 10:47, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
naming
[edit]Hi MongolWiki! I'm actually kind of confused about the terminology regarding the term Southern Mongolia and Inner Mongolia. In general we should try to use more usual names, but what do you think in some specialist cases such as linguistics? Not to talk about other people, but the terminology itself is kind of confusing. Thanks if you could answer my question. --Chinyin (talk) 18:02, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry it was my bad to do some weird stuff in the past, but they were bad ideas and should not have happened anyway. Thanks for understanding. --Chinyin (talk) 15:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hope you can do some more real constructive stuff as well, instead of something you know to be not quite correct, or probably knowingly do some stuff that contains centrism etc. Thanks. --Chinyin (talk) 16:05, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, MongolWiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, MongolWiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)