User talk:Moneytrees/Archive 1
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Thanks! I know this is just an automated TW welcome, but i appreciate it.💵💵💵💵 (talk) 14:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
You signature
[edit]Hi. You signature is an infringement of policy. Policies are our strictest rules. Please see WP:SIGIMAGE and change your signature so that it correctly identifies you as a user. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Okay I changed it to this, which should be fine: 💵Money emoji💵Talk 14:16, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
Persona Q GAN
[edit]Hi! It's not a problem or anything - I had planned to do a GAN for PQ for ages - and I will help out with addressing any issues that may come up in the review, but just wanted you to know that normally you should talk to regular editors of an article before nominating it for GA if you are not a significant contributor to it yourself.--Alexandra IDVtalk 00:16, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I actually was going to inform you that I nominated it, because I got to the article by clicking on the link from your page. I think it's pretty high quality article about a great game that should be able to stand among the other SMT articles.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 01:13, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
Joke AfDs
[edit]On April 1 of every year there is typically a few joke AfD nominations, but keep in mind that these tend to be controversial and should never affect article content – see Wikipedia:Rules for Fools. In particular, Twinkle should be avoided when making a joke nomination because it automatically adds an AfD tag to the article in question, as well as a notification to the article's creator. Additionally, you should remove the text that says {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD}} because if you don't, a bot will automatically add an AfD tag to the article anyway. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:24, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, I didn't know. Next year I'll be a little more careful.😎HellaswagdabXD😎emoji😎Talk 12:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
User subpages
[edit]It's easy: go to User:Money emoji/whatever, on the page you see next there's a link which says "Start the User:Money emoji/whatever page". Click on that and it'll take you to an editing interface, when you save that edit the page will be created. Hut 8.5 06:33, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Ship AfDs
[edit]I noticed that you intend to nominate more ship articles for deletion. While ships over 100 tons (undefined) and 100' length are generally held to be notable enough to sustain an article, notability still needs to be demonstrated to enable an article to be kept. Ships under that criteria may also be notable enough to sustain an article.
That said, the three nominations you made appear to be good ones, which I've supported the deletion of. May I ask a favour? If you nominate further ship articles, would you be so kind as to add an entry for each at the bottom of WP:SHIPS/AFD? Mjroots (talk) 15:57, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Sure- I would have earlier if I had known it existed. Thanks for supporting me in the AfDs.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 16:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Minerva
[edit]Thanks for your comments - see my recommendation to merge with General Grant (ship) on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minerva (1864) which is why I added the additional information. NealeFamily (talk) 23:24, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
@NealeFamily: The information about the ship is already on List of shipwrecks in 1864, although a passing mention of James Teer/The General Grant survivors finding the stave diffantly wouldn't hurt.
Yeah...
[edit]I thanked you for something. But what that was I can't even remember. It might have been for tagging Tessa brooks for speedy deletion, but I can't say for sure. Got your message, either way. Home Lander (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Home Lander:The article was deleted, which is why it must have not shown up in my notices when I re- checked it after I typed that. Anyways, thanks for telling me, now I feel like I'm not crazy.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 01:39, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's okay, next time you could just tag your userpage with this.
Home Lander (talk) 01:40, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's okay, next time you could just tag your userpage with this.
Help
[edit]Can I get my information back about the Felly page? Also I took out my name in the title so why is it still being deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inpuza (talk • contribs) 17:54, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
@Inpuza: It was deleted initially because the sources provided didn't seem to establish him as notable. Like I said on your talk page, non- primary sources must be used to make something notable. It was then repeatedly deleted because It was recreated with few changes and still didn't have proper sourcing. If you want the information that was deleted back, You could go ask around here If you want the information back, but if you just want to recreate the article with no reliable sources again, I don't think it will go over well for you. If you can't find any sources, than I would say there isn't any point in creating the article.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 18:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Inpuza: Not only that, but you will need to use a WP:Sandbox if you don't want your article to be deleted again. That way, you can continue working on it in your personal space and hopefully improve it. One caution though, even if you will work in personal space, its against our policies to keep copyvios in drafts, such things get deleted and quite fast. Hope, that helps. :)--Biografer (talk) 01:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- You meant a WP:UP#SUB, not a sandbox, yes? Vermont (talk) 01:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Hey, 💵! I came across your SPI case while RC Patrolling. In the future, when you're dealing with chronic sockpuppeteers that have an M.O. like Fuerdai and you're looking for a CU to check for sleepers, it's actually pretty counterintuitive to notify them that you opened an investigation. Once they know that you're opening an investigation, they'll typically change up their M.O., bringing you back to square 1. I had a situation like this not too long ago, so if you need any guidance in the SPI process, feel free to hit me up! OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Ah, I remember reading about that on the long term abuse case pages. I'll make sure to ignore informing him next time I see one. Thanks for the heads up! Also, thanks for using 💵 to addresss me.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 21:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
The Duck template
[edit]In order to use the duck template in SPI, type {{Duck}}. SemiHypercube (talk) 12:29, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh, I thought you had too get an image stuff for that. Anyways, thanks.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 12:43, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Rollback granted
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e7/Wikipedia_Rollbacker.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Rollbacker.svg.png)
Hi Money emoji. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
- Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
- Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
- Rollback should never be used to edit war.
- If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
- Use common sense.
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 15:36, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Pending changes reviewer granted
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg/130px-Wikipedia_Reviewer.svg.png)
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.
Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
See also:
- Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
- Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
- Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
Widr (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
A Suggestion
[edit]Hi Money Emoji, I saw you frequently fight against vandalism with Twinkle, and you got rollback two days ago, so I suggest you try out Huggle, an anti-vandalism tool which you can patrol recent changes and revert edits very quickly. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 11:50, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
@Abelmoschus Esculentus:Thanks (I might have to archive this page soon, it's getting kind of big), but the problem is that I use a low quality, work issued chromebook for editing. When I get a better computer, I might install it; but for now, I'm intentionally avoiding it.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 12:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Oh I see. You can archive your page when it is larger than 75KB according to this. Regardless, thank you for your contributions for fighting against vandalism. Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:34, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth
[edit]The article Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Persona Q: Shadow of the Labyrinth for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 14:01, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Just a chat
[edit]Your sign is so cute. How did you set it? Hhkohh (talk) 05:26, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Hhkohh: I took (stole) inspiration from the bolding and green shadow used in L293D's (L293D (☎ • ✎)) signature, and then kept on changing the style color to a random number until I found the perfect shade of green. The emojis were put in to fit the aesthetic. I thought it looked cool, and I'm happy someone took notice! 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 16:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Edit War on The Independent
[edit]FYI, I also reported the vandalism and personal attacks on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. --KNHaw (talk) 21:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- @KNHaw: thanks. Honestly, I agree with him, but he isn't using reliable sources, which is why this whole fiasco is happening.💵Money💵emoji💵💸 21:59, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- It is a damned shame. I just posted a long wp:good faith comment to their talk page (you should see alerts to mentions of your name). I suspect I won't see a civil reply, but I have to at least give it a shot.
- Thanks again for your work on this. --KNHaw (talk) 23:04, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Heal the Living
[edit]What are you talking about? Heal the Living is rated NC-17 in the United States.
It probably is, but you need to cite a reliable source when adding content. You can put the movie back in the article once you find a reliable source saying it is Nc-17 rated. Otherwise, It stays out.💵Money💵emoji💵💸 01:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pizzagate conspiracy theory
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pizzagate conspiracy theory you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 05:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pizzagate conspiracy theory
[edit]The article Pizzagate conspiracy theory you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pizzagate conspiracy theory for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 04:21, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Pizzagate conspiracy theory
[edit]The article Pizzagate conspiracy theory you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pizzagate conspiracy theory for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CaptainEek -- CaptainEek (talk) 07:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
Sock puppets on your talk page
[edit]Let me know if you want me to semi-protect your talk page. It makes communications more difficult, so we don't usually do it for very long. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
@NinjaRobotPirate: Unless it gets to an extreme level, I don't need any semi-protection. Thanks for the offer though.💵Money💵emoji💵💸 16:59, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
Some person
[edit]dear to user, i create the page from the real news of biography person from indonesia & please don't delete my page without permittion under user — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimas gilang (talk • contribs) 15:56, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
- Fine, I'll remove the tag and we'll see how the article fairs when it comes to Afd.💵Money💵emoji💵💸 13:40, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Don't delected my article my page
[edit]![]() |
Don't delected my article my page |
don't make me angry, if you deleted my article ? Dimas gilang (talk) 06:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC) |
- @Dimas gilang: I didn't delete it, I nominated it for deletion. Someone else will delete if the outcome of the discussion is delete. I don't have the power to, only Admins do.💵Money💵emoji💵💸 13:06, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Money emoji. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of John B. Magruder
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John B. Magruder you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AustralianRupert -- AustralianRupert (talk) 03:20, 22 November 2018 (UTC)