User talk:Moneymake10000000r

edit request

Can I edit the crips page Moneymake10000000r (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Moneymake10000000r (talk) 00:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, United Blood Nation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I {{request edit}} on the crips and bloods pages I have source that tell me the right membership Moneymake10000000r (talk) 17:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moneymake10000000r, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Moneymake10000000r! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rollin 60's Neighborhood Crips, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That membership is actually for the Whole Crips street gang the Crips always had more members than the bloods Moneymake10000000r (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Crips. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit directly contradicted the cited source. Meters (talk) 05:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons for not using your unsourced values were already explained to you on the article's talk page. Don't keep making this change. Meters (talk) 05:05, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Bloods. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:43, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Crips. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:54, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 19:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Crips. You have already been blocked for this. Meters (talk) 06:27, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This has already been explained to you on the article's talk page. You need to provide a reliable source for the numbers you are claiming. I notice that the numbers you are claiming now are not the same as the numbers you were claiming before. That does not change things. We have a seemingly reliable source. If you want to change that number then find a more recent reliable source. Adjusting your estimates is not going to help you get this material into the article. Meters (talk) 07:13, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Widr (talk) 18:47, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]