User talk:Money's sock (aka yeet)

December 2018

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Money's sock (aka yeet), does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock please

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Money's sock (aka yeet) (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi @Oshwah:. This is Money emoji, and this is a legit alternate account that I created incase my main one is compromised. I get the misunderstanding, since the name sounds kinda stupid and trollish.

Accept reason:

Ohhhh! I get it now! That makes a lot more sense in terms of legitimacy now. :-) Sounds good to me - I'll unblock you now. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:09, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I'm telling the truth.💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 19:09, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. You are now free to move about the project. ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

karl anselm

The reason why I remove some content from those pages is because some information was already listed in the infobox, that information was the birth and death places. Most article leads don't include birth and death places, only birth and death dates. For example, this is the lead to Wilhelm II's article

"Wilhelm II (German: Friedrich Wilhelm Viktor Albert; 27 January 1859 – 4 June 1941) was the last German Emperor (Kaiser) and King of Prussia, reigning from 15 June 1888 until his abdication on 9 November 1918 shortly before Germany's defeat in World War I."

It should not say "Wilhelm II (German: Friedrich Wilhelm Viktor Albert; 27 January 1859 in Kronprinzenpalais, Berlin, Kingdom of Prussia – 4 June 1941 in Huis Doorn, Doorn, Nazi-occupied Netherlands ) was the last German Emperor (Kaiser) and King of Prussia, reigning from 15 June 1888 until his abdication on 9 November 1918 shortly before Germany's defeat in World War I."

I hope you understand what I mean. 78.108.56.35 (talk) 17:23, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Syracuse, Ontario and New York Railway

The source states: "From the 1913 annual report of the New York Central System"

Which means the original material is now in the public domain.

There is a small technicality — the 1913 annual report is clearly in the public domain, while this site is undated and may not be old enough to qualify as public domain, but you cannot convert public domain text into copyrighted text simply by copying it at a later date. Ideally we would have a reference to the original annual report, but that might not be easy to find. I prefer that we not remove it as a copy file but add a reference. --S Philbrick (Talk) 14:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick: Ah, sorry, I forgot about the whole public domain thing. I agree that instead inserting a reference would be far better. That'll also likely be the last revdel from me today, since the internet archive is blocked at my work (?!?)yeet (talk) 14:42, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks, and sorry to hear you cannot access the archive.--S Philbrick (Talk) 14:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]