User talk:MondoManDevout

Regarding your post on the h0/hO debate, and whether wiki's English language guidelines ask contributors to adhere to current English language usage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style EXCERPT: "Unless there is a clear reason to do otherwise, follow the usage of reliable English-language secondary sources. If the sources can be shown to be unrepresentative of current English usage, follow current English usage instead—and consult more sources."71.177.166.43 (talk) 09:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Jon Lovitz was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept our apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 04:48, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to look at the SMS.ac, Inc. page once more - I noticed you have participated in the past. The article was recently stubbed and is being rebuilt. --Raga 20:42, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Scrying. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Instead of sacking Constantinople, actually read the lede and see that it does not say that scrying works, or that there is such a thing as magic, and that the lede ends with:

"Nevertheless, like other aspects of divination and parapsychology, scrying is not supported by mainstream science as a method of predicting the future or otherwise seeing events that are not physically observable."

Also, instead of disruptively just erasing the lede, if you have a problem with it, go to the article's talk page and suggest rewrites (with actual suggestions for what to do besides "this needs to be rewritten.") Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edit to Every time you masturbate... God kills a kitten, as you blanked the whole page. If you feel that an article should be deleted, please take a look at Wikipedia:Deletion policy. Blanking a page is now how articles are removed from Wikipedia. —Tommyjb (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]