User talk:Mondas
|
Please cite your sources
[edit]Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Heran are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --NMChico24 19:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Tengu clan
[edit]Tengu clan, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Tengu clan satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tengu clan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Tengu clan during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:49, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Demon (The Cave)
[edit]I have nominated Demon (The Cave), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Demon (The Cave). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC) TTN (talk) 19:39, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Dreil
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dreil, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 16:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Battle of Mars
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Battle of Mars, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Node Drive
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Node Drive, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Tuatha Dé Danann (Atlantean)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tuatha Dé Danann (Atlantean), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Sorin (Dark Planet)
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sorin (Dark Planet), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Haydonites
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Haydonites, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Series 9
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Series 9, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- notability is not established
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
The article Thierna Na Oge (comics) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- The fictional city does not meet the general notability guideline and the article is a plot-only description of a fictional work.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jfgslo (talk) 01:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Re: Wikipedia
[edit]Hi, thanks for asking about the Omnipedia. Yep, the old site is gone (long story); however, I am working on getting it set up again at my new site. Hopefully that won't be too much longer... JEB215 (talk) 20:57, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
- Responding to your response: The Omnipedia should pick up exactly where it left off. There might be some changes backstage, but otherwise it should look and run just the same. Thanks for the support! JEB215 (talk) 03:26, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- I have finally restored the Multiversal Omnipedia - the new URL is http://moa.omnimulti.com/ . Enjoy! JEB215 (talk) 03:02, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
The article Heran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Any evidence of notability?
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --EEMIV (talk) 23:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Haydonites for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haydonites is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haydonites until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SephyTheThird (talk) 20:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)