User talk:Momspack4

Welcome...

Hello, Momspack4, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users - please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Happy editing! Steven Walling 23:18, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am continually disgusted and frustrated. I made some simple additions to the page about Aethelred the Unready yesterday, and as always, the former writer rushed in and reverted it. He or she could not possibly have even given my changes consideration because those things I added were simply historical detail and are accurate and widely accepted history. They are not controversial facts by any means. This seems to happen every single time I add something small to a page. I am an editor by profession; I can't tell you how many times I correct grammar, punctuation, or correct a sentence for clarity, and it is immediately reverted to the incorrect! I just don't understand how you can pretend to maintain a site of any quality, if people who are making sound, accurate changes or adding sound information are continually reversed. Am I misunderstanding some rule? I am to the point where I don't even bother, usually. Why bother? And I have to tell you, I have learned that if a person wants to research a subject seriously, Wikipedia is NOT reliable info. Momspack4 (talk) 01:13, 31 July 2019 (UTC) Lichen Craig[reply]

Hi Lichen Craig, I'm sorry to hear about the frustration. At least the recent frustration seems to be mainly about Special:Diff/908625603. In this edit, Dudley Miles has removed the addition of content. Adding content requires verifiability; simply "knowing" something is not sufficient. All that is needed to restore the text is providing a reference. Especially for well-known facts, finding such references should hopefully be an easy task.

If something is clearly incorrect and lacks a citation on Wikipedia, you can always remove it, justifying the removal with "WP:BURDEN" in your edit summary.

Feel free to remove incorrect information, but when adding new sentences, please provide references for them. Wikipedia makes no guarantee of validity, but we try to do our best, for example by removing sentences that lack a reference. We can't just rely on someone's word for it. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:53, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ToBeFree Thanks so much for all the advice. I re-inserted my additions and added citations. We'll see what happens now. I also want to thank you for the welcome and additional information, much of which I have never been able to locate. It will make life much easier! Momspack4 (talk) 05:06, 31 July 2019 (UTC)Momspack4[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Momspack4. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:41, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

O3000 (talk) 22:14, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]