User talk:MomotaniSS

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Andamanese has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Andamanese was changed by MomotaniSS (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.884751 on 2020-01-05T17:14:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:14, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess this was a mistake. Maybe because of the copied content? Nevertheless thank you for the message!MomotaniSS (talk) 17:19, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding mine and similar edit by IP

Recently you claimed in an edit note on the Dravidian peoples page that an IP that had made an edit (I believe to the Peopling of India or Archaeogenetics of South Asia page) similar to one I later made to the Dravidian peoples page was my IP. That is not the case. That IP that made the edit you mention was not me. I only edit using my account. I made my edit after they had and was in part following their lead. However they (as a result I also) were incorrect about some of the details of the Mondal et al. study (i.e. that it does not mention Indians being closest to Central Asians and does in fact mentions their affinity to Sou seethern Europeans). I apologise for the careless error (which I corrected as soon as I could after checking the study) that was my mistake, but I ask that you please do not make unfounded accusations/assumptions. Again, the IP is/was not me. Skllagyook (talk) 17:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, it is all well. Can you also take a look at the IP edits? They are pushing fringe POV and seem to use more than one IP at the same time. I vereted them now and have reported it to an user who has knowledge to this topic and the articles.MomotaniSS (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I see. Thank you. And I will try to check the sources later (though I see you are now engaged in a discussion with the other user). Skllagyook (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

None of those are POV edits, it was provided and sourced. I could not sign in as I didn't know the password to my account and had to get it restored.Ilber8000 (talk) 18:01, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]