User talk:Momoj

Thank you for experimenting with the page Best Buy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Kuru ^talk 21:44, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Best Buy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 22:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Best Buy, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guess what? bestbuysux.org...not a reliable source. --Onorem 23:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not exactly sure that these edits are vandalism, but Momoj, please review wikipedia's NPOV policy, as the consumer protection information you posted is a clear violation of that. You might also find this policy useful as well. You are certainly entitled to your own beliefs on Best Buy, but the Best Buy article is an article about the company itself, not your personal forum to share your personal opinions. Dr. Cash 23:48, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Best Buy

The company is proud of its undesirable customer service.

I'm sorry, and I should remain civil...but you are just plain stupid if you believe that statement. If you want to add comments about the undesirable customer service, fine...but to imply that the goal of the company is to provide poor customer service is ludicrous. I hope you can keep your obvious bias out of future edits and I'm ashamed that a short block wasn't issued for the "contributions" you've made so far. --Onorem 03:49, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox on which you can speak your opinions about the Best Buy company. There are forums on the internet for that. The Best Buy Wikipedia article is here to simply provide a neutral, informative article about the company. Not for posting these "consumer protection" notices, as you call them. You been asked to stop by several editors now. Please respect our requests. B2bomber81 04:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed your Consumer Protection article, yet again. Please see the Best Buy discussion regarding you edits to the wiki so that we can discuss this and work it out. Thank you. B2bomber81 16:56, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you taking the time to discuss this issue. But please in the future, refrain from referring to me as a best buy agent. The only interest I have in best buy, is that I have chosen to edit this page among many other pages that I help edit and wish to see it become a good article. Thank you.

Wikipedia is not corporate property

Threats from employees and agents of Best Buy are not valid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Momoj (talk • contribs)

Continued edits to Best Buy

I am not an agent of Best Buy and would appreciate not having my motives questioned. Yes, the issue has been discussed, and from reading the talk page...YOU are the only person who thinks your edits are appropriate.

I posted the following on your IP's talk page.
Please. Find another article that has a section similar to what you're trying to add here. The first link is redundant. Why do you insist on including it? The bestbuysux and CRM links are not reliable sources. Please justify their inclusion. The other link was moved into the criticism section so I don't see how you could have an issue with that. Just putting a section header above a bunch of links isn't appropriate. --Onorem 01:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please take your rants elsewhere Momoj. It has no place on wikipedia. You are the only one here that believes your edits are appropriate. Several other editors have agreed that you are being unreasonable. So, your changes will continue to be reverted until you start playing by the rules that wikipedia has in place. B2bomber81 06:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalising the Best Buy article. Your last edit has violated wikipedia's 3 Revert Rule. Continue to violate the rules and you will find your user account banned. Dr. Cash 23:58, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank my talk page and insert rude comments like you just did. That is most definitely considered vandalism. You have been reported for your second 3RR violation within 24 hours. Dr. Cash 00:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The content which you are insisting posting on the Best Buy article is in dispute, I ask that you refrain from any further reverts on the article. You have made 4 reverts in the past 24 hours, which is a blatant violation of the 3RR rule, as well as continued vandalism to the Best Buy article.

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. B2bomber81 00:25, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 24 hours for violations of 3 Revert Rule and NPOV violations

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 01:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely

It has become apparent that your account is only being used for vandalism, so it has been blocked indefinitely.

This is for creating the attack article Customer Service At Best Buy after all of the above warnings. NawlinWiki 05:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]