User talk:Mollymouse

[[==Welcome!==

Hello, Mollymouse, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Quick introduction to Wikipedia
How to write a great article
Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia, an essay from PLoS
Identifying reliable sources for medicine-related articles (general advice)
Wikipedia's Manual of Style for medicine-related articles (general style guide)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page.

If you are interested in medicine-related themes, you may want to check out the Medicine Portal.
If you are interested in improving medicine-related articles, you may want to join WikiProject Medicine (sign up here or say hello here).

Again, welcome! Graham87 04:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Hi Molly, thanks for your edits to Smallpox vaccine and Fleam. Regarding your edit to the former page, there are a number of tools that can be used to make it easier to add medical citations using a DOI or a PMID. The one I use is the Citation expander. Graham87 04:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Hi Mollymouse! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Base on folk knowledge does

in fact already tell us that the idea was not new, does it not? There is the risk that if we put the whole story in detail in there the article will become unwieldy and long rather than pointing people to the articles on Jenner and Smallpox and Jesty for more detail. It is a delicate balance. In telling the story it perhaps flows better to say what was done, rather than that it was not new but was done. Thanks for the reference there in artifical induction of immunity. Midgley (talk) 21:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]