User talk:Mollica93
|
Copyrighted images on your user page
[edit]Hi,
I wanted to let you know about a problem that a few of your fellow editors have attempted to rectify: On your user page, you cannot use copyrighted images, like the logos of the NBA teams. Our criteria for using copyrighted images expressly prohibit using them on user pages or user talk pages. Doing so violates the copyright of the owner of the image. Because of that, you can't use those logos on your userpage. You are, however, free to use any images that are not copyrighted to liven up your userpage. Please let me know if I can assist you further. --SSBohio 03:47, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Please don't put copyrighted images back on your userpage. They have been removed three times now. If you persist, it could result in loss of your editing privileges. --SSBohio 03:52, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Editing Template:Affliction Events
[edit]
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Vicenarian (T · C) 22:31, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of UFC Ultimate 100 Greatest Fights
[edit]I have nominated UFC Ultimate 100 Greatest Fights, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC Ultimate 100 Greatest Fights. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. --aktsu (t / c) 08:27, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
August 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to UFC 107, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Drr-darkomen (talk) 23:04, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
- Just as a note to this, unless you have a brand new source for that matchup it isn't reliable. All of the "older" sources out there all list the bout as "tentative" which is defined as "probationary: under terms not final or fully worked out or agreed upon". This means the fight is still up in the air and should not be added until something more concrete surfaces. Thanks. --Drr-darkomen (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi
[edit]An editor that expressed concerns before now completely ignores the sources and wants to say which sources are valid and which isn't. This in no way helps with the wiki article. Please have a say here:Talk:Strikeforce Sea888 (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Ultimate Fighter: Heavyweights Finale, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
Please do not removed sourced content from articles without good reason and explaining that reason. See the article's talk page for more information and to comment on listing the Kimbo Slice match. TreyGeek (talk) 20:25, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Howdy, ya forgot the Cardinals, Dodgers & Rockies, in your color scheme. GoodDay (talk) 22:39, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 2009 OHSAA Football Playoffs
[edit]A tag has been placed on 2009 OHSAA Football Playoffs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:33, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of UFC 111
[edit]I have nominated UFC 111, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UFC 111. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Friginator (talk) 01:51, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Read this
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Revert_only_when_necessary
You have no reason to revert the bracket. You've given no good reason why it should be done and the previous version is perfectly valid and looks better. Paralympiakos (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- I will just state that I much preferred the borders for the boxes, but I felt that a compromise was needed, so I removed it so we both get a little of what we want.
With regards the episodes in the bracket, it just creates too much clutter, when users can scroll upwards to find out what ep (hence the bolding of fights in the summary). The difference is that the round and method of victory is more important than the episode. Paralympiakos (talk) 20:03, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- We've already compromised over this. I thought that the matter was over. Please stop reverting the bracket. It's now met in the middle so that both parties are satisfied, so don't try to have your own version of it. Paralympiakos (talk) 23:47, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- It's a problem because it's too cluttered. It's a massive eyesore. Like I keep saying, it's about compromise. I gave up on the borders. It would nice and respectful for you to give up on adding the episode to the bracket. You are the only one who wants this method as past TUF pages have my method consistently. Once again, please just leave it. Paralympiakos (talk) 23:55, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
- I changed TUF9 because I thought we'd agreed to keep the combined style. I can look at S6 to see your style, but you should look at every other season which has my style (albeit with 1-4 having letters instead of colours). This is the most widely accepted method of a tournament bracket, so please let it die and just leave the seasons of TUF as they are. Paralympiakos (talk) 00:04, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Finding your messages really hard to read. No idea what you meant by the last one. When has there ever been seeding in it? There are no seeds in TUF. Now I placed a bracket down first, so you should have left it alone. I hope this matter ends here. Please leave the bracket alone or it will be treated as vandalism. Paralympiakos (talk) 00:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
- Football is a different case than MMA. A date is important, otherwise no-one would know when the match was played. In this case, the episode is just a single scroll of the mouse up. Please STOP reverting it. I'm getting very bored of reverting. One more and I'm transferring the edits from your IP to here. Paralympiakos (talk) 00:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Edit War at The Ultimate Fighter: Heavyweights
[edit]I want to caution you in regards to the three revert rule and edit warring. I see you, Paralympiakos and an IP have been having an edit war over the brackets. I haven't looked at it in detail. (I won't see the episodes until Wednesday and doing want to spoil it for myself.) If there are issues other than obvious vandalism, I suggest you take your issues to the article's talk page and work them out there. Otherwise, you are leaving yourself open for a temporary block of editing privileges. --TreyGeek (talk) 00:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Ultimate Fighter: United States vs. United Kingdom, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
It would be a good idea to provide an edit summary to explain your edits. Particularly for edits that may be controversial or need explaining such as changing Andre Winner's flag to a non-UK flag when nothing suggests why he should have anything other than UK flag. TreyGeek (talk) 20:40, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
- You edited UFC 105 changing Winner's flag back to that of Grenada with the edit summary of "no reason why that should be reverted." The reason it should be reverted is that according to Andre Winner's article, he is of British nationality. WP:MOSFLAG offers several guidelines for the use of flags. One of which is a flag should be used to represent a person's nationality, not their place of birth. Further down it states that for sportspeople, a flag should represent the person's sporting nationality at the time of the event, if the flag is used in regards to an event.
- Winner's nationality is British, he was representing Britain in all of his fights thus far, therefore he should have a British flag next to his name. If you have a valid reason why it should be otherwise, I would welcome hearing it.
- PS... don't forget to WP:SIGN your talk page edits. --TreyGeek (talk) 22:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
(From TreyGeek's talk page) Andre Winner does not represent Britian he reps. Grenada —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mollica93 (talk • contribs)
- Do you have source to cite that Andre Winner represents Grenada when he fights? What information do you have to back up your claims? Remember that Wikipedia is a place where WP:VERIFIABLE information can be found. Find a source to back up your claims and I will go with it.
- A couple other notes. Again, do not forget to WP:SIGN your talk page comments. Also, the Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines suggests to "Avoid posting the same thread in multiple forums" (WP:MULTI). So, feel free to respond on this page; it allow anyone else who wishes to monitor the discussion or join in and do so easily. --TreyGeek (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
(From TreyGeek's talk page) did you watch UFC 105 on the tale of the tape it had Grenada flag not a Union Jack flag — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mollica93 (talk • contribs)
- This issue has been brought up at the MMA WikiProject (link). The flags that the UFC uses in it's tail of the tape graphic is the flag of the fighter's birth country. This is not the country they are a a citizen of or the country that the person is representing in a sporting sense. Thus, that graphic would not be an appropriate source for verifying Winner's nationality in a sporting sense, for that or other events.
- Two additional questions for you. Is there a reason you fail to WP:SIGN your talk page comments? Also, is there a reason you broke this conversation up onto my talk page rather than keeping it here in one place as I suggested/asked? --TreyGeek (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
- Mollica, I'm adding this message as a reminder not to change Winner's nationality to Grenada again. UK or ENG is to be used, not Grenada. The reasoning has been provided already. Thanks. Paralympiakos (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Mollica93
[edit]User:Mollica93, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mollica93 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –BLACK FALCON (TALK) 07:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
March 2010
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bellator Fighting Championships: Season Two. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please discuss edits on the article talk page Jezhotwells (talk) 02:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Piyfhygdgdcfgg
[edit]You moved your user page to Piyfhygdgdcfgg.[1] I have moved it back to User:Mollica93/Piyfhygdgdcfgg --Rumping (talk) 13:15, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:UConn Huskies depth chart
[edit]Template:UConn Huskies depth chart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –Grondemar 23:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:JFC logo JFF.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:JFC logo JFF.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Mollica93/JFF
[edit]User:Mollica93/JFF, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93/JFF and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mollica93/JFF during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --TreyGeek (talk) 02:24, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Template:2009 Akron City Series Football Standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:2009 Federal League Football Standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:2009 Independent Football Standings (OHSAA) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:2009 Northeastern Buckeye Conference Football Standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:20, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Template:2009–10 NBA Conference standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 21:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:WEC title holders
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:WEC title holders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).
Thanks. MattParker 119 (talk) 11:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Cyhi-da-prynce-royal-flush-2.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Cyhi-da-prynce-royal-flush-2.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Using userpage for hosting again
[edit]It appears that you are once again using your userpage as a host for some sort of contest unrelated to Wikipedia. We've deleted this userpage before (Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93) and it could be marked for speedy deletion right now. Would you please explain the content of your userpage? Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Template:Affliction Events has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 19:38, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
Template:Ultimate Fighter Bracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 12:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:WEC title holders has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Osubuckeyeguy (talk) 08:49, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
Template:NBA Playoff Bracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In List of 2011–12 NBA season transactions, you recently added links to the disambiguation pages Richard Hamilton and David West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
List of current UFC fighters
[edit]This is copy/pasted from the discussion about WEC records from the talk page and should answer your question precisely.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 20:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
- Ok I understand what you're saying here, and I am in no way interested in including Pride or Strikeforce fighter records, because no new divisions will be or were included with the folding of pride or the inevitable folding of Strikeforce. As I tried to make clear above the UFC created this problem by promoting fighters as UFC champions for what they achieved in their sister organization. If they had automatically made Dan Henderson UFC light heavyweight champion for his Pride or Strikeforce accomplishments, or made Gilbert Melendez UFC lightweight champion for his Strikeforce accomplishments then I would advocate doing the same thing stretching back to the UFC's acquiring of both organizations (which wouldn't be particularly long history for either). But they didn't do that so it's a totally different scenario. Even if the UFC only refers to their UFC record as their official record in UFC fights they handle every single former WEC fighter based upon their WEC achievements, making it much easier to make sense of their place in the division. Thus this is displayed (and noted) here because it provides a clearer picture of the fighters career even within the UFC. On the whole it could be argued that the idea of UFC records is itself a theoretical construction as it is merely a subset of a fighters professional record. Also remember that these WEC records make up only a minority of listed records, thus the category is labeled UFC records and outliers are clearly noted. This seems fair and the simplest way of making sense of the strange enveloping of the WEC by the UFC. If the UFC had decided to do the more complicated thing and make each fighters in effect start from scratch and hold featherweight and bantamweight title fights after a year or two of match ups in the division in the UFC, then I never would have considered including their WEC records, but they took the straightest path through the mud and essentially just copied and pasted the divisions over treating each fighter based entirely upon his WEC career, so this reflects that. Once again, as time goes on this will become less and less of a problem because fewer and fewer of these fighters will be around, but in the meantime this just makes more sense. I could relabel the divisions if it was that important, but at that point it's just an argument over semantics. Thaddeus Venture (talk) 00:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Essentially, it's an organizational thing.Thaddeus Venture (talk) 20:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
Nice Roster Page
[edit]Really well done, if you need help with it let me know! Glock17gen4 (talk) 20:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Your userpage
[edit]Once again, you're using your userpage as a host for some sort of contest unrelated to Wikipedia. I've removed the content per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93. If you persist in using your userpage in this way, the page may once again be deleted, prevented from recreation and/or this account be permanently blocked. Please STOP abusing your privileges here. If you have questions, ask. If you need a wiki hosting service, please have a look at Comparison of wiki hosting services. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:56, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Mollica93/Madden League
[edit]User:Mollica93/Madden League, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93/Madden League and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mollica93/Madden League during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Mollica93/ZUFFA and MMA Rankings
[edit]User:Mollica93/ZUFFA and MMA Rankings, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93/ZUFFA and MMA Rankings and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Mollica93/ZUFFA and MMA Rankings during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 19:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Your own wiki style articles
[edit]In response to this comment you made;
If you're looking for an alternate host for your content, have a look at Comparison of wiki hosting services for some alternatives. Also, Wikipedia:Alternative_outlets#Directory_of_alternatives may be of use to you. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:14, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Cyhi-da-prynce-royal-flush-2.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Cyhi-da-prynce-royal-flush-2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Disambiguation link notification for February 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 2013 in UFC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Jim Miller, Michael McDonald, Antonio Silva, John Dodson, Phil Davis, Brian Bowles, Roy Nelson, Jon Jones, Ben Henderson, Ian McCall and Rory MacDonald
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in UFC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sarah Kaufman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Your userpage
[edit]Once again, you're using your userpage as a host for some sort of contest unrelated to Wikipedia. I've removed the content per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mollica93. If you persist in using your userpage in this way, the page may once again be deleted, prevented from recreation and/or this account be permanently blocked. Please STOP abusing your privileges here. If you have questions, ask. If you need a wiki hosting service, please have a look at Comparison of wiki hosting services. Thank you. – X96lee15 (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:USA National Basketball Team roster
[edit]
Template:USA National Basketball Team roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Bagumba (talk) 07:02, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Mollica93. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Turkey National Basketball Team roster
[edit]Template:Turkey National Basketball Team roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:46, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mollica93. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:List of UFC Current Champions
[edit]Template:List of UFC Current Champions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 13:46, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:2TeamBracket-MMA
[edit]Template:2TeamBracket-MMA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:4TeamBracket-MMA
[edit]Template:4TeamBracket-MMA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:17, 30 March 2021 (UTC)