User talk:Moleoz

Welcome

Hello, Moleoz, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is Moleoz's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: J. J. McCullough (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:J. J. McCullough and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:J. J. McCullough, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Moleoz! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Images for cricketers

Hi. Please stop uploading and adding images that you do not own. Unless you took the image yourself, it's pretty safe to say that you do not own the copyright to the image. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to re-add images that you do not own the copyright to. Please STOP this. If you continue to do, you will be blocked. Please reply here to state you've read and understood this. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 12:35, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned repeatedly that the images I uploaded were done with the help of a tutorial. I was not aware of the 'This is not my own work' option, until a couple of pictures later. I'm still not sure how to change the copyright claims of the images a wrongfully claimed ownership to, so can't this be ignored as a misconception error? Moleoz ^{Fire Walk with Me} 22:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please stop adding non-free images which are not owned by you on the articles of cricketers as you did to MS Dhoni and some other articles. Any images which have been collected from other sites are not permitted unless they qualify as fair use with a proper licensing. Please see WP:IUP which explains the policy for using images. See WP:NFCC, which describes the non-free content criteria. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you continue to revert edits by adding those images, you may be blocked. Thank you. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 07:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are again adding those images. Please stop this otherwise you will blocked from editing. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 07:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

This is your only warning; if you add an inappropriate image to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — A.A Prinon ^{Leave a dialogue} 07:55, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Cristabel0. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to PewDiePie have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Cristabel0 (talk) 08:13, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No live updates

For Test matches such as India women's cricket team in England in 2021, the only time the match needs to be updated is at the end of a session (lunch, tea and close of play), or an innings break. We don't change the game status every time it's stopped for rain, as we're an encyclopedia, not a news ticker. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:22, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Point understood, will not do from now on. Thanks 2302(talk) 20:52, 18 June 2021 (GST)

Hi. Also, please stop adding bold around the points for the matches. This is not done on any other cricket articles. Look at the women's Ashes, for example. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

India national cricket team

Please do not add File:Cricket India Crest.svg to the infobox of India national cricket team. As explained on the article's talk page, the logo was removed from the page as a result of a discussion at WP:FFD. There is a long-standing practice to not allow non-free crests of specific teams or governing bodies in the more general articles about national cricket teams. Point 17 of the non-free content guideline regarding images goes a bit more into it. ✗plicit 00:53, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:J. J. McCullough

Hello, Moleoz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:J. J. McCullough, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:J. J. McCullough

Hello, Moleoz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "J. J. McCullough".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:29, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2022-23 Manchester City F.C. season#First team squad

Hi Moleoz. I appreciate you are disappointed by me reverting your recent edits to the format of the first team squad table. However, as you yourself have pointed out, it is usually best practice to first engage in a discussion on an articles talk page before making significant changes to content or format. You have failed to do this before you embarked on your changes. I have worked with other contributors over several seasons to refine the presentation of first team data on the Man City season pages and this current format has not been created without some considerable time and effort from us. You have tried to over-ride this without first engaging in a discussion and you have not yet presented your reasons for wanting to see the format changed now. I have created a section in the talk page to discuss this yesterday, but still you have not made any comments. I have provided my reasons why I believe the existing format is better than the one you propose and I have made some changes to the template to address some of its current shortcomings vs. your proposal. I have reverted the edits you made again this morning until that discussion takes place and I will accept the change only if there is a significant number of users who agree with you. Ratchet8865 (talk) 10:51, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

alright what do i do Moleoz (talk) 11:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the section on the talk page of the article. If you still want to make your case for a change, either add to the section I've created or create a new section. Just state what you want to do and why you want to do it and ask users for their opinions. If there is a majority agreement I will accept it. Ratchet8865 (talk) 11:12, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just a suggestion, but you might want to consider using the template 2 October 1992 (age 32) rather than writing each players birthday and age in plain text. With the template the age will be automatically updated when their birthday is reached rather than having to update manually. Ratchet8865 (talk) 08:46, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The template is Error: Need valid birth date: year, month, day Ratchet8865 (talk) 08:49, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The date entered will update itself when the player's birthday arrives, look at the code, the age is not there, when the birthday comes, the age updates automatically, so it should be all good.

Either this or I dont understand what you are on about Moleoz (talk) 08:50, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In my editor it just appears as plain text. ie. like 9 August 1997 (age 24), which won't update the age to 25 on 9th August 2022. I was suggesting that you replace this with a template which will update the ages automatically as you suggest. It may be you have coded this already and I'm just not seeing that in the page editor I'm using. In which case apologies. Ratchet8865 (talk) 08:57, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One other tip (if you allow me) based on our previous conversations. If you want to quickly revert page edits to a previous page version, the shortcut is to go to page history and click on the date and time link for the version you want to restore. When it loads, click to edit it, and you can then publish it as the current version. You then don't have to make the same changes manually again. Ratchet8865 (talk) 09:02, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For your first point, It seems to work for me, so I have a hunch its from your side, will see if there is anything I can fix to make it better. For your second point, thanks, will use that Moleoz (talk) 10:30, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Manchester City F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oleksandr Zinchenko. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Rico Lewis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rico Lewis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:28, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]