User talk:Moland Spring

Your move of the life on Mars

Your move was completely unnecessary. There no need for parenthetical dabs for the article. Also, beware that copy-and-paste moves, like your earlier move of it to Life on Mars (scientific theory) are discouraged here. Voortle 20:01, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop messing with the redirect at Life on Mars. Every time you do that, you break every link to Life on Mars (theory), since they all go through that redirect. This is appropriate, because the proposal to move the theory back to Life on Mars is about to close and has clear consensus (as discussed at talk:Life on Mars (theory)). The links and redirects are keeping the functionality consistent, so that no one has to go and fix all the links after the move.

Further interference with this consensus-based move may be interpreted as vandalism.--Srleffler 05:56, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tall men and women

Why have you put it up for deletion? If there is a list of tall men and women and short men and women how can that not be nonsense? People keep deleting entres on the other lists because no one can agree. If somebody wants to know the height of a celebrity here it is. What is your problem? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:37, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So why is it people can create a sub stub about a crappy Japanese video game character and have it kept as crucial to wikipedia? OK maybe the information is trivial but it is still relevant. If you want it up for deletion I propose you propose it, and on the discussion page rather than sticking your beak in and deleting someone elses work.

How is this different to:?

I mean people start articles on reality contestants. This is not meaningful yet it is allowed. Part of wikipedia is relaying information to a reader. 'The sum of human knowledge' even if some human knowledge appears less important than others. 99% of my entries are usually 'meaningful' setting out geographical places. You are not going to delete my work mate. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:47, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Roy Leep up for deletion again

The Roy Leep has been renominated at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roy Leep (Second nomination) Lost Knob 08:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]