User talk:Mokaiba11

FYI

One of the rights accorded to the owner of copyright is the right to reproduce or to authorize others to reproduce the work in copies or phonorecords. This right is subject to certain limitations found in sections 107 through 118 of the copyright law (title 17, U. S. Code). One of the more important limitations is the doctrine of “fair use.” The doctrine of fair use has developed through a substantial number of court decisions over the years and has been codified in section 107 of the copyright law.

Section 107 contains a list of the various purposes for which the reproduction of a particular work may be considered fair, such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Section 107 also sets out four factors to be considered in determining whether or not a particular use is fair:

       The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
       The nature of the copyrighted work
       The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
       The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work

August 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gunparade March. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Farix (t | c) 21:14, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Anime Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Anime Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gunparade March. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Jsharpminor (talk) 21:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Image of Kenya-ABC.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Image of Kenya-ABC.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:34, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Two-way selection system" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Two-way selection system and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 19#Two-way selection system until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. DarylKayes (talk) 08:41, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]