User talk:Mojolino

Welcome!

Hello, Mojolino, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- The Red Pen of Doom 16:12, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scotty Cameron

I have removed all mention of Robert Bettinardi from the Scotty Cameron article as I can find no reliable sources to verify that he was the actual person who made the individual putters, although I believe he did some work for Cameron (and others) prior to setting up on his own. If you have verifiable and reliable sources to support the information you keep adding (and J krcmar keeps reverting) then please feel free to re-add it, but ensure that you cite your sources. Any questions, please ask (you can reply here, I will see it). Thanks. _wjemather ^bigissue 20:00, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive non-WP:NPOV & WP:COPYVIO editing of this article. I have reverted your latest edit to go back to a properly sourced version. The bio page on the Scotty Cameron website is not sufficient for the changes you are making, and copying it word for word is unacceptable. Please discuss on the article talk page before making any further changes. Regards. _wjemather ^bigissue 14:08, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do I reply to you in this section? I see no way of doing so other than to use the edit feature?

It is perfectly clear that I am referring to the Scotty Cameron article. _wjemather ^bigissue 14:27, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you are talking about. I want to know how to discuss this with you here in a manner other than hitting the edit button and adding comments to you like this.

That is the only way. So it is clear to others, please sign your comments by adding "_wjemather ^bigissue 14:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)" at the end of your posts. Thanks. _wjemather ^bigissue 14:49, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LINK SPAM

Please top posting the advertising site: therainbowriver[.]com on rainbow springs rainbow river marion county etc. PeterWesco (talk) 06:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The web site TheRainbowRiver.com is not an advertising site. It is a site that is entirely devoted to providing information about The Rainbow River and the State Park associated with it. It is not a business, it sells no products or services, and it is not an advertising site. There are advertisements on the site that help in a very minimal way to offset some of the expenses of running the site. Feel free to purge the Wikipedia site off all references to the site and for that matter my account, I just do not care anymore. It is frustrating and a waste of my time to continually try and provide updated and accurate information to Wikipedia only to have some other person take action based on a lack of knowledge or some feeling that they are "saving the world". If you are going to remove some of the information I added to Wikipedia regarding The Rainbow River and TheRainbowRiver.com, then please remove the balance that included the maps and photographs that I added to the pages that are my work product.Mojolino PS: I still have not figured out how to properly "sign" these entires and at this point do not care.

Proposed deletion of File:The Rainbow River Logo.gif

The file File:The Rainbow River Logo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 13:21, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]