User talk:MojoYoung

Welcome

Hello, MojoYoung, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is MojoYoung's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aqueela Zoll (May 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aqueela Zoll and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aqueela Zoll, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MojoYoung! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 19:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of FrenchPeople (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MojoYoung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

wow, I'm contributing editor for a good faith, I am not as FrenchPeople, The parameter b/n me and FrenchPeople is so different. So please unblock me I'm innocent? So far, I didn't do anything that affect the project, I am another person. I want to free from this suspected user. You can see the evidence for my contribution carefully in my talk page.

Decline reason:

There's no doubt in my mind at all that you are the same person. Yamla (talk) 11:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've combined your two unblock requests - you only need one. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging request

This account has been blocked indefinitely because its owner is suspected of abusively using multiple accounts.

(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets)

MojoYoung (talk) 07:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Request for email

{{unblock | reason = According to my contribution, I had edited 1 article, 2 draft creations, the minimum edits. However, I have ambition to attribute Wikipedia months time. I hadn't seen such kinds of problem prior. The sock user may disleads me to despair and discourage to involve the comminty. I like these community as well as administrators and their tasks to avoid disruption. I want to email from my account - BlueNile@00.com. Thanks. MojoYoung (talk) 14:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinite exact date request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MojoYoung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account didn't make mistakes yet. But most users unintentionally get into sock puppetry due to the similarity of the same apps. For example: A person registered Wikipedia account in Google Chrome App but he's soon registered again when the first account blocked other than sock puppetry. The application cannot extinguish out of his device. But forced to open an account in another browser. This situation is very upsetting for the user. Does my account will unblocked in November 2018 (six months) if I had refrained from any edits and evasion from now?

Decline reason:

This doesn't make any sense, nor does it address the reason for your block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Diff request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MojoYoung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I told you many times, You can see the FrenchPeople address. See this link in his talk page. ▪ "https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FrenchPeople#/talk/20". He has been advised then blocked due to altering drafts name three times but he couldn't make one. ▪ I had minor edit in article "AirAttack". Look for. "https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/842469735". I had corrected "Vought- F4U-Corsair" to "Vought F4U Corsair" (without hyphen) in order to link properly to the article.

Decline reason:

CheckUser Confirmed sockpuppetry. —DoRD (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It's just not plausible that you are unrelated to FrenchPeople (talk · contribs). The overlap in your editing, including that of deleted articles, leaves no reasonable doubt. As such, I'm revoking your talk page access to prevent you wasting any more of our time here. --Yamla (talk) 13:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]