User talk:Mohnjack

Speedy deletion of Duncan MacDonald

A tag has been placed on Duncan MacDonald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Paste (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Duncan MacDonald

A tag has been placed on Duncan MacDonald requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fritzpoll (talk) 21:38, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. _GB^T/C 21:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of inappropriate pages

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Duncan MacDonald, you will be blocked from editing. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 22:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Explain

Hello,

I have posted one of the players who links off of the 1961 Memorial Cup link, Duncan MacDonald. Each time I try to post the information, which is easily verifiable both through the links I updated in the article and via newspapers and more, I get messages saying that I cannot post this, it has no signifigance or that I am now going to be banned? Please clarify this as I don't understand how this is insignifigant considering it is all factual and certainly is a valuable and requested piece of information of that era of hockey in particular. Just so you know, that era of hockey laid the groud work for what is the St. Michaels team today and of many years past since.

I appreciate it.

Regards,

MohnjackMohnjack (talk) 14:36, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The fact is, administrators will not search Wikipedia for links to Duncan MacDonald. The notability assertion (that is, the subject's main claim to fame) has to be in the article itself, and preferably in the very first sentence. So he was in the 1961 Memorial Cup... What has he done there that got him noticed? What about his NHL career? You might want to take a look at WP:SPORTS, and, if you think MacDonald is notable per those guidelines, you might want to rewrite the article to reflect that. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:13, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Understood

Hello,

Ok, well I think I understand. I understand upon review of your guidelines that unless someone has achieved something short of professional achievement, or having time as a professional wherein a considerable contribution of their efforts has reflected to that as well, they have no place on this service.

That is what I understand. I thought this was somewhere that anyone could post anything provided it was substantiated.

My mistake.

MohnjackMohnjack (talk) 02:00, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]