User talk:Moheroy

Welcome!

Hello, Moheroy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Rockero 16:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mountain View High School (Mesa)

The reasoning behind the prod is that it fails to assert its notability. The article needs to be written in a way that demonstrates why its notable, and that needs to be backed up with sources. If there are similar articles that fail this test, they should also be considered for deletion. If you can fix the situation so that the article no longer meets deletion criteria, please do so. - Stephanie Daugherty (Triona) - Talk - Comment - 11:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As Triona (talk • contribs) says, the article needs to be improved. What does it do particularly well? Does it offer the International Baccalaureate program? Have any of its sports teams won a state championship? Did the design of the school win an architectural award? In general, all high schools are notable, but the current version of the article is only a stub. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 12:39, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- It is clearly a stub, but on what grounds should a stub be deleted? I had never heard of this high school before this morning, technically I think I have never even been in Mesa, so I can hardly improve it. In the future in this situation should I just flag it as a stub? Moheroy 12:51, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Giovanni Battista Guglielmini

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Giovanni Battista Guglielmini, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07061a.htm. As a copyright violation, Giovanni Battista Guglielmini appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Giovanni Battista Guglielmini has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Giovanni Battista Guglielmini and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Giovanni Battista Guglielmini with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Giovanni Battista Guglielmini.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. andy 12:07, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NB wrongly deleted - the Catholic Encyclopedia is public domain. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:56, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Enoch Powell, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please be sure not to kill a flag (like [citation needed]) when adding content. - sinneed (talk) 02:35, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

it seems that my reference is intact in the current Feb 14, 2010 article. It was not a test edit, and appears to have been constructive. ~moheroy~

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lanhee Chen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Brahman (Bos indicus).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:06, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Moheroy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]