User talk:Mohammed alkhater

January 2012

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Kudzu1 (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Kudzu1 (talk) 07:08, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Happysailor ^(Talk) 07:11, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I suggest you stop vandalizing this page immediately. Kudzu1 (talk) 07:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Δρ.Κ. ^{λόγοςπράξις} 07:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 07:34, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More edit wars

They're back at it again, see the Invasion of Kuwait‎ history. Please block/ban this user from making edits. Hzoi (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising‎, you may be blocked from editing. Mohamed CJ ^(talk) 15:57, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey, you may be blocked from editing. Alex2006 (talk) 12:30, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. TerriersFan (talk) 20:56, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being nearly a disruption-only account. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]