User talk:Mohammed Qays

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Razzak Abdul Wahid (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Mims Mentor were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Abdul Razzak Abdul Wahid and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— MimsMENTOR ^talk 07:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mohammed Qays! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — MimsMENTOR ^talk 07:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yasin Taha Hafiz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Yasin Taha Hafiz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Hey man im josh,

Unfortunately, interacting on English Wikipedia is very discouraging. I often try to ignore some of the warnings because they are misplaced, and this makes me consider leaving it and focusing solely on contributing to Arabic Wikipedia. No matter what you do, you find your articles being deleted or ignored for unconvincing reasons. The biographies I wrote about are well-known, and there are numerous Arabic sources about them. However, it seems that searching for the Arabic name instead of relying on the English name should be the standard for determining the significance of a topic or article. This might be my last contribution here. Best regards. Mohammed Qays (🗣) 18:17, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are allowed to use non-English sources for articles on English Wikipedia @Mohammed Qays. The article was moved to draft space (not deleted) primarily due to a lack of sources which help to establish the person's notability. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:19, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh And what about the article Abdul Razzak Abdul Wahid? The response was unconvincing despite the presence of sources for every piece of information. Mohammed Qays (🗣) 18:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Reuters and Al Jazeera sources are certainly good sources, but I'm not familiar with the first source used, the one hosted on Archive.org. Perhaps that's the issue that @Mims Mentor ran into as well? I'm not sure since I did not review that myself. I think if you found one or two more sources mentioning him as any of those poet titles it would help significantly towards having the article be accepted at AfC. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:26, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hey man im josh Thank you for explaining each paragraph, this is exactly what I needed. Best regards to you, have a great day! Mohammed Qays (🗣) 18:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You as well, and thank you for the effort you're putting in to improve English Wikipedia's coverage in areas that are often more neglected due to language barriers! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]