User talk:Mohammed Al-Keesh

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmed Jehani

Hello, Mohammed Al-Keesh. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmed Jehani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ahmed Jehani

Hello, Mohammed Al-Keesh. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ahmed Jehani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Use of human shields by Hamas

Please read WP:ARBECR, as a non EC user, you can only use talk pages in this contentious topic area to post WP:EDITREQs. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 19:23, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Banu Qurayza ‎, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not constructive? It's obviously not neutral when every point made against the Muslims is provided, but anything in the opposite direction must have double the lines describing why it's the Muslim reasoning is false. You can't serioiusly say that an article is filled with orientalists and has a full parapgrah describing a completely speculative opinion that the Prophet to almost a third of the world's population disguised his desire to execute deutoronomy-esque punishment, but when the Muslim side is shown just a bit by saying "well this is an old testament idea, and the arbitor was a Jew" it's immediately undermined with twice the number of sentences saying 'this is a misunderstanding of deutoronomy" or "there's no contemporary sources" as if there's any to begin with. So if I'm not constructive tell me how. Mohammed Al-Keesh (talk) 21:47, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Banu Qurayza. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. So for next time: use the talk page, base your arguments on Wikipedia's content policies, and present relevant and reliable sources accordingly. Writing long complaints about other editors in your edit summaries is neither constructive nor convincing. This applies to all editors on Wikipedia. R Prazeres (talk) 17:16, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain how it's disruptive to offer a different perspective. Also make sure you leave the same note to the guy who said "muslims are violent", that's if you want to be fair. Mohammed Al-Keesh (talk) 18:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You also need to stop edit-warring (i.e. repeatedly reverting) at Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom. Edit-warring is prohibited behaviour and doing this repeatedly can get you blocked. There is no justification for restoring poorly-sourced material added by a sockpuppet two months ago, as you are doing here, and you have not provided any explanation either. Again, use the talk page, and/or cite a proper source that matches the criteria of WP:RS. R Prazeres (talk) 20:12, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you're talking about the Banu Qurayza page. Yea I reverted the Timeline of abolition of slavery and serfdom page because it deleted the Medina entry, which I posted in the talk page. Please put that entry back. Thank you. You also didn't reply to my message about the Banu Qurayza page. Mohammed Al-Keesh (talk) 20:15, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

remember you're coming at me when you left this "or that of timeless cruelty of Muslims towards Jews and the intrinsic violence of Muslims in general" on the Banu Qurayza page. Mohammed Al-Keesh (talk) 20:17, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll reply on the Banu Qurayza talk page, but it's not up to me alone to approve your edits. You are expected to take a collaborative approach on Wikipedia. If your only reaction to feedback and warnings is to be combative, you will most likely end up getting more and more frustrated rather than actually learning how to improve your edits. Keep in mind that warnings like the ones above are basically telling you how to not get yourself blocked from editing Wikipedia. Take them in that spirit. R Prazeres (talk) 20:26, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I asked you what I did wrong in my first reply. Then I showed you how something this which apparently is cool to you "or that of timeless cruelty of Muslims towards Jews and the intrinsic violence of Muslims in general". If this is combative, it's in your eyes not mine. Nice pictures btw. Peace. Mohammed Al-Keesh (talk) 22:39, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]