User talk:Mohammed106

Mohammed106, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Mohammed106! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021

Hello, I'm Njd-de. Your recent edit(s) to the page Coat of arms of Libya appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 19:16, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Olive Lembe di Sita. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. – NJD-DE (talk) 08:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Silvia of Sweden, you may be blocked from editing. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You Bbb23 i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real

Mohammed106 (talk) 14:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You Bbb23 i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real Mohammed106 (talk) 14:38, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You Bbb23 (user) i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real Mohammed106 (talk) 14:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); Mohammed106 (talk) 15:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You Bbb23 i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real Mohammed106 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You Bbb23 i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real Mohammed106 (talk) 14:12, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sundostund Can you please talk to Bbb23 to Unblock my page please i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real please talk to him i sand to him a message and he don't replyed me to now Mohammed106 (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to request an unblock pursuant to the instructions in the block notice, do so; otherwise stop messing around on your Talk page, or your access will be revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:38, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i don't disruptive editing i just edit the info i know it from any one know about the info please unblock because i didn't do any wrong info i just right the think i know in real Mohammed106 (talk) 21:50, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is incomprehensible. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:05, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bbb23

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

that the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i'm blocked for, i will not do it again, and i will make productive contributions instead. Mohammed106 (talk) 12:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are just paraphrasing the last decline message. You need to explain what you did wrong and what you will do differently in future. PhilKnight (talk) 13:51, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mohammed106 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok i'm sorry i will not do it again i know i did something wrong and i know what is it just please unblock me Mohammed106 (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you are unable or unwilling to tell us what exactly you have done wrong, I am declining your request and removing talk page access to prevent more wasted time. That will leave you with WP:UTRS for further appeals. 331dot (talk) 22:13, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.