User talk:Mohamed1900q

June 2016

Hello, Mohamed1900q, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Dribrahim555 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Tony Tan · talk 21:16, 30 June 2016 (UTC) ok no problem, u are welcome, are u solve problem,i told u before,thanks--Mohamed1900q (talk) 21:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm JudeccaXIII. I noticed that you recently removed some content from El Shorouk Academy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:56, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 23:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at El Shorouk Academy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grayfell (talk) 05:58, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You've again removed content from El Shorouk Academy against consensus. You've wasted countless hours of volunteer time having why it is included explained over and over. Pleaae stop, as this is the last warning you will receive from myself before I open a discussion at WP:ANI. I understand your concern with the content, but we do not censor information that is reliably sourced -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 08:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]