User talk:Modoetia magni

Hi Modoetia magni! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 21:30, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome Modoetia magni!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,306,779 registered editors!

Hello, Modoetia magni. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful: The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia A Primer for Newcomers Introduction to Wikipedia Wikipedia Training Modules Simplified Manual of Style Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies: 1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly 2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources 3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 01:16, 5 May 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

Seconda Divisione moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Seconda Divisione, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:34, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Seconda Divisione concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Seconda Divisione, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Seconda Divisione

Hello, Modoetia magni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seconda Divisione".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 23:00, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Seconda Divisione

Hello, Modoetia magni. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Seconda Divisione".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:16, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Cesena F.C

Please don't carry bold merge. Cesena F.C., by their official website, said clearly they are not the same club as A.C. Cesena. Cesena F.C. was in fact Romagna Centro Cesena. Matthew hk (talk) 13:24, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Matthew hk Matthew hk (talk) 01:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

As ACF Fiorentina is not AC Fiorentina, SSC Napoli is not SC Napoli, Torino FC is not AC Torino, and so on. There are no relevant reasons to make differences between similar cases.--Modoetia magni (talk) 14:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Fiorentina, Torino and Napoli uses Article 52 of NOIF, but Cesena is not. Matthew hk (talk) 01:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at A.C. Cesena. You cannot carry controversial merge before making a consensus Talk:Cesena F.C.#Cesena F.C. merging with A.C. Cesena (& more) Matthew hk (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Moved from User talk:Matthew hk Matthew hk (talk) 01:25, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at A.C. Cesena. In Talk:Cesena F.C.#Cesena F.C. merging with A.C. Cesena (& more) you seem to be alone again a general consensus with the merging. Please explain why you see differences with all other similar cases in Italian football. Thanks.--Modoetia magni (talk) 23:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Il 1973 rimane quindi l’anno di fondazione della Polisportiva Martorano che nell’ultimo decennio diventerà ASD ROMAGNA CENTRO.....In seguito al fallimento dell'AC Cesena da luglio 2018 l'ASD Romagna Centro diventa ASD RC Cesena e, grazie al sostegno di Cesena FC spa, inizia una nuova avventura divenendo così la prima squadra della città di Cesena. Un libro aperto con tante pagine ancora da scrivere.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181224031255/http://www.romagnacentro.it/il-club/index.html

Cesena F.C. never used Article 52. Matthew hk (talk) 05:18, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)