User talk:Modlin1414

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Eli Modlin, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Curran (talk) 00:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Quadzilla99 00:56, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to New England Patriots, you will be blocked from editing. Pats1 01:07, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Baltimore Ravens

You keep inserting Eli Modlin in the list of people with a "ring of honor". Although I know nothing about the subject, you wrote an article about Eli Modlin (now deleted) and described him as a high schooler "future player". I'm happy for your optimism, but you need to stop inserting false things about yourself into Baltimore Ravens. shotwell 02:55, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

he is not me, there are really future players, and i was trying to give wikipedia the upper hand. my name is modlin because i am a big fan of his. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modlin1414 (talk • contribs)

Notability of Bishop walter thomas

A tag has been placed on Bishop walter thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 00:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of New Psalmist Baptist Church

A tag has been placed on New Psalmist Baptist Church requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 01:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Psalmist Baptist Church

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of New Psalmist Baptist Church, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.newpsalmist.org/history.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:55, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter S. Thomas

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Walter S. Thomas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Orphan and unreferenced, with little notability indicated. Promotional?

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Scott Mac (Doc) 14:43, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]