User talk:ModernThreat101
March 2017
[edit]Hello, I'm Operator873. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Tennessee Walking Horse seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Operator873 (talk) 07:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Tennessee Walking Horse. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please refer to Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and the statement: "Articles must not take sides, but should explain the sides, fairly and without editorial bias. This applies to both what you say and how you say it." You should also provide references and source materials for your statements instead of presenting only your point of view as the case in fact. I encourage you to gather the information required and consider writing a subsection presenting that point of view and explaining that opinion. Operator873 (talk) 11:54, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tennessee Walking Horse have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 10:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 10:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
ModernThreat101 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #17739 was submitted on Mar 13, 2017 11:33:30. This review is now closed.