User talk:Model710

Welcome!

Hello, Model710, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Carcharoth (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism guideline

Thanks for the comment on my talk page .I've proposed we create a separate plagiarism guideline (or rather, how to detect, deal with and avoid it). Please contribute at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Wikipedia:Plagiarism. Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 20:14, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Model710 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock. Administrator Friday said to just edit normally and everything will be ok. However, I am blocked. So please unblock. Wikipedia requires that any denial of unblock must be done along with an investigation. If so, please investigate and answer why the original ban is valid even though the POV pushers destroyed evidence (deleted it) and made claims that the evidence disproved. They claim the ban is for impersonating a doctor. The doctor submitted his diploma but the POV pushers deleted the picture and falsely made the claim. I am neither Derek nor the doctor so that's another reason to be unblocked

Decline reason:

See Friday below. Also utterly confused request. — Sandstein 05:44, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

While I can decide not to personally block you, if someone else does it, my ability to do anything about it is fairly limited. And honestly, my desire to do something about it is pretty limited at this point too. I stand by my original claim, that if some new editor shows up and edits usefully, nobody is very likely to go hunting around trying to associate them with some banned editor. You brought up a bunch of old socks, so you brought suspicion upon yourself. If you had instead started editing usefully instead of stirring up old drama, we'd be looking at a different situation right now. Friday (talk) 00:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Checkuser says

Confirmed as a sock of Dereks1x (talk · contribs) - Alison ^❤ 16:40, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]