User talk:Mng2009

If you wish to appeal this block further you will need to contact WP:BASC by email. 21:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to National Basketball Association, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: National Basketball Association was changed by Mng2009 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975992 on 2011-07-10T17:26:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:26, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to National Basketball Association constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 17:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to National Basketball Association. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. MrChupon (talk) 17:32, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National Basketball Association, you may be blocked from editing. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 20:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru (talk) 21:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I realize I made a bad choice and will be back to make productive edits in 31 hours.Mng2009 (talk) 21:43, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mng2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like my block to be shortened to 24 hours so I can resume constructive edits today at 4:39 pm EDT today. As you see here from my recent edits I have updated the rosters for all the Detroit Tigers minor league affiliates and the Lansing Lugnuts page.

Decline reason:

I think the extra seven hours will give you more time to consider why we blocked you in the first place. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mng2009

June 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Sexy and I Know It, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sexy and I Know It was changed by Mng2009 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956822 on 2012-06-01T19:52:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sexy and I Know It with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 19:56, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Koala, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Koala was changed by Mng2009 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965716 on 2012-06-01T19:59:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:59, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Sexy and I Know It. ... discospinster _talk 20:03, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mng2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for over two months and I'm ready to return and make productive contributions. Mng2009 (talk) 16:58, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Time served" is not in and of itself a reason to unblock a user. I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mng2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I regret the unconstructive edits I had made to Sexy and I Know It and Brooklyn Decker. Those edits were not for the greater good of Wikipedia. I have had a while to think over it and I am ready to return to making productive contributions.

Decline reason:

That is almost exactly what you said in 2011. I think that your time as a Wikipedia editor is probably over, and you should get used to your life as a person who just reads articles on Wikipedia without changing them. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.