User talk:Mmmovie

Welcome!

Hello Mmmovie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Marilyn Monroe have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —tregoweth (talk) 03:13, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Monroe

Can you please ensure that any future edits to this article follow WP:V? Thanks --Guinnog 03:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disappointed you ignored my advice there. I'm going to make it a formal warning this time. Can you please make sure that any future edits follow policy? You should also be aware of our WP:3RR policy; revert warring is frowned upon here. --Guinnog 06:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Bellinghaus

AfD nomination of Mark Bellinghaus

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Bellinghaus, has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bellinghaus. Thank you. Bwithh 05:45, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advice - go to above, state your case calmly and reasonably, say you are a new editor unused to the ways of wiki and ask for help from experienced editors to shape the article in the proper way. In the meantime, try to trim it down and write it from a neutral point of view. Tyrenius 06:18, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Monroe--the exhibit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Marilyn Monroe--the exhibit, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Kinu ^t/_c 06:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I speedy deleted it. It was a copyright violation. --Guinnog 06:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New to Wikipedia

After your "warnings" I tried to get in touch with you and asked you for {help} but you never replied. I have worked for 13 months with some people to who supported my investigation, and I thought that the facts that I brought to light are important for this wonderful site. Through Wikipedia anybody can see what is happening in terms of Marilyn Monroe, and the fraud that is happening every day. You seem to pursue me for whatever reason. Dunno really why, but I told you that I have no clue how to do things correctly, as I am not as perfect in terms of this computer language (editing etc) but I would appreciate if you would help, instead of requesting to have me kicked out. It seems like very political and everybody is important. But can't you just see what I have found out? Remember David against Goliath? That is what happened in this case, Guinnog. At least I signed in and have a working signature. I just need some help here. Is that so hard for you to understand? Please think about this, too. I really would appreciate it. I don't know any Wikipedia specialist in my circle of friends! Mmmovie 06:21, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, this is a better way to communicate, so well done. I wish I could help you, but as I tried to explain before, this is an encyclopedia we are writing. It is not a place for a campaign of the sort you appear to be waging. Can I suggest you read up on some of our policies (WP:NOR, WP:V and WP:NPOV would be a good start), and then you need not feel so clueless. I am sorry if you feel I am pursuing you; I assure you I am only acting to protect the integrity of the article against your repeated addition of unverified information. When you are ready, and really feel you understand our policies, you may try again in the article talk page. Meanwhile you can start on gathering verifiable references for the changes you want to make. Best of luck, --Guinnog 06:29, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but why are you removing my links? I have the website going for one year and that is warning about fraud--I got thousands of thank you emails from all over the world. I also have shown and sold my art, but you also removed the link in the art section.

I have brought in important information and more important: FACTS about Marilyn Monroe. You should really click the links before you blindly remove them.

I always gave references to what I posted.

Instead of writing me good bye emails, it would be so wonderful of you if you would look into what I just told you. Maybe it will be fun to help some new member and guide him. Your help would be, I say it again: highly appreciated. Mmmovie 06:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

None of the above was intended to be anything other than helpful. I am pointing you to the resources you will need if you want to learn to edit here in a way that will not get your edits removed. Whether you choose to follow my advice is entirely up to you of course. --Guinnog 06:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message. I suggest you read the policies I referred you to above and then I think it will all become clearer. Best wishes, --Guinnog 19:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In the meantime, can you please refrain from making more edits to the article without establishing consensus on the talk page first. Thank you. --Guinnog 19:55, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for 24 hours for repeatedly adding your unverifiable material to the article. I sincerely hope you will use the time to read up on the policies of this project. Edit-warring against consensus will lead to blocks and is not the way to get material added to an article. Best wishes, --Guinnog 20:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please read this article that was written eleven months ago, and that shows you what I have been fighting for the last 13 months now? You think that this is not worth being added to the Marilyn Monroe history? People claiming to be Marilyn's friend and claiming to own tons of her items, when it is provable fake?! I don't get it. I have given you enough info on this and all you do is blocking me. Do you have any idea how hard the fight was? How much the lawsuit against the exhibit fraud means to the fans of Marilyn Monroe?! The scandal is, that the people who are supposed to protect her, actually sell Marilyn Monroe out. They showed her claimed underpants and more disgusting items. Please read also this follow up article Mmmovie 21:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC) and you will understand a bit better what I am trying to tell you. Thank you, Mmmovie 20:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do sympathise with you; I know you are sincere in trying to do good. It is, however, imperative that when you return you try to build consensus in discussion with other users as this is a collaborative project. Will you please do that? --Guinnog 20:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vielen Dank fuer Deine Zeit und ich habe soeben gelesen, dass Deine Staerken editing ist, neben anderen. Koenntest Du denn nicht, falls ich Dich fuer Deine Zeit und Arbeit bezahle, meine Seite in eine professionelle Seite umaendern? Dies ist wirklich kein Bestechungsversuch, Guinnogg. Ich kenne leider niemanden der mir dabei behilflich sein koennte. Du sagst auch, dass ich gegen die copyright verstossen habe? Aber Du bist doch selber auch Fotograf. Das Foto wurde von mir aufgenommen, in Hollywood. Die copyright gehoert doch mir. Ich habe gerade Deine ganzen Auszeichnungen gesehen und natuerlich weisst Du was richtig ist, hier auf Wikipedia. Aber ich habe wirklich probiert mein Wissen mit einzubringen. Ich will nicht Deine ganze Zeit in Anspruch nehmen, es ist ja schon spaeter in Schottland. Aber ich waere Dir sehr dankbar, wenn Du Dich meiner Seite annehmen koenntest. Was immer ueberfluessig und zu viel ist, und was Deiner Meinung nach raus muss, ich vertraue Dir. Ich habe ueber drei Tage und Naechte dran gearbeitet. Und den Artikel auf der "Marilyn Monroe--the exhibit" Seite habe ich wirklich selber geschrieben. Ach ja, ich habe noch einen follow up Artikel oben eingebracht. Ich wuenschte Du waerst in LA, ich wuerde gerne von Dir lernen. Ich bin uebrigens auch ein Fussball und Bier Liebhaber wie Du. Und ich reise auch sehr gerne, wir haben also schon eine Menge gemeinsam. Alles Gute, Prost Mmmovie 21:05, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke sehr. Ach, du sprichst so gut deutsch! Aber ich kann jetzt nur ein Bischen schreiben. Ich habe viel vergessen weil ich habe nicht seit drei Jahre Deutchland besuchen. Ich habe auch nicht sehr viel Deutsche Bücher gelesen in diesen Jahren. Bist du Deutsch? Ich sage dir, als ich dich helfen können, dann soll ich. Wir können vielleicht besser auf englisch reden? Alles Gute, --Guinnog 03:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bitte schoen. Ja, ich bin in Deutschland geboren, aber da es mir immer zu kalt war, bin ich erst immer im Winter nach Hawaii (habe Freunde dort) und dann ab nach LA.

Dein Deutsch ist uebrigens fast perfekt. Ich habe auch schon sehr viel vergessen in den elf Jahren seitdem ich schon hier lebe. Ich vermisse Europa taeglich mehr. Sorry, yes, thinking in English and then when your mom calls you, you feel like stupid when you have this accent and your mom says "Was?" und du must erstmal umschalten auf Englisch/English...gibt es eine Moeglichkeit Dir zu emailen? Wie gesagt, ich moechte Dir fuer Deine Arbeit auch etwas bezahlen, aber momentan bin ich total abgebrannt, weil ich mit all meinen Ersparnissen die Klage unterstuetzt habe. Ich bin auch sehr nah dran aufzugeben und wieder zurueck nach Deutschland zu gehen und schlichtweg zu erfrieren. lol Du bist aber sehr frueh wach. Bist Du denn nicht in Schottland? Hope you understood what I wrote. In which country was Wikipedia originally established? Do you know that by any chance? Have a good day, and how do you get in touch with people if you are not allowed to give out emails? Just wondering. I promise to play by the rules and I am only trying to pass on the information that I learned in many thousands of unpaid hours of my investigation. I really love this idea of filling in info and knowledge. Just today there was a news story that the way you have been edjucated it will influence you the length of your life. So, here you go.... Mmmovie 05:48, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In der Moment bin ich auch in California, in der nahe von San Francisco; ich komme wieder in Schottland nächste Woche.

You can email me any time you want; just click the "E-mail this user" link at the left when you have my user page User:Guinnog open. I can't accept payment to help you, but as I said before I will be happy to do what I can to help you, for free. However, the project has strict rules about the kind of evidence we accept to regard a theory or whatever as notable. Learning those rules, and then using them wisely and well to establish consensus, could be the first steps towards the sort of work you want to do. You have to accept the possibility though that, failing more mainstream acceptance of your theory, it may still not be regarded as viable for inclusion. You also have to accept that you are too closely associated with the theory to ever add it to the article; if it is done, it will have to be done by others. Finally, let me stress that there is absolutely nothing personal in any of this, I am merely enforcing our rules and policies as I see them.

Sorry for replying in mostly English; it was fun trying to dredge up my German, I don't use it enough. See the Wikipedia article for details of the project's history. I'll happily unblock you if you indicate you understand what I wrote above and undertake to abide by it.

Best wishes, --Guinnog 06:55, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am overwhelmed with the rules at the moment, think I won't touch it and will let you do the editing. Mmmovie 07:17, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. You are now unblocked. Good night. --Guinnog 07:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and sorry for the stress I caused. Mmmovie 07:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AUTO. You may only edit this article to correct obvious errors of fact etc. Please ask another editor to make any other changes you want. Thank you. --Guinnog 02:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ArtXL1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ArtXL1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The website that is shown on the image in form of a water sign is my own website and I did not steal it from anybody since I took this image which is stating "We can do it" in terms of taking on the fraud and deception and win the case against one of the most famous lawyers in this country, Mark Roesler. Shall I remove the image anyhow? Mmmovie 05:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you give us the link to the website where you took the picture from? And then assert on the Image page that you revoke the copyrights over this image for its free-licensed usage on Wikipedia? — Nearly Headless Nick 07:56, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, I downloaded it from my own computer and the website that is shown by name on it, is my own website. It is an image that I took in Hollywood. I can really just remove it. I might have just forgotten to click something about releasing the rights as public domain. Aha--I will try to do that tomorrow, since it is late here and I am dead tired now. Thanks for your support! ;)Mmmovie 08:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I retagged the image and it is now public domain. Mmmovie 05:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's not retagged. Click here. Delete {{Somewebsite}}{{no license|month=January|day=1|year=2007}}

Copy and paste this in instead: {{GFDL-self}}

That means anyone can use it, but they have to credit you. If you want to do do public domain instead, then copy and paste {{PD-self}}, but that means they don't have to credit you. Choose one or the other. You can't revoke, once you've tagged (but you can change from GDFL to PD).

Tyrenius 04:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:MarkThe Bavarian.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MarkThe Bavarian.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MarkThe Bavarian.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:MarkThe Bavarian.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Bellinghaus

I have nominated Mark Bellinghaus, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Bellinghaus (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:38, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Childrenpassport1967detail.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Childrenpassport1967detail.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 23:22, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Verkehrsgericht'88.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Verkehrsgericht'88.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hux (talk) 00:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC) --Hux (talk) 00:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for Image:Verkehrsgericht'88.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Verkehrsgericht'88.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:40, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MB movie still26.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MB movie still26.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Liebe Jelena-1-....jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Liebe Jelena-1-....jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:06, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:03, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Immer wieder Sonntag.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Immer wieder Sonntag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MB in Flaming Armadillo.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MB in Flaming Armadillo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:10, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Dolores Liar.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dolores Liar.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Headshut.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Headshut.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:MJ&June.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MJ&June.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:QM MM panel 11-10-05.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:QM MM panel 11-10-05.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:ArtXL3.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ArtXL3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:04, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:The beauty of dying....jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:The beauty of dying....jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:26 pennies in front of....jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:26 pennies in front of....jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Hans & Hanna Sauerbrey, born Keil & grandkids,.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Hans & Hanna Sauerbrey, born Keil & grandkids,.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:InLandau1978.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:InLandau1978.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Alex, Patricia, Mark.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Alex, Patricia, Mark.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:05, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mom&me,.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mom&me,.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Little crowler.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Little crowler.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Childhood4,.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Childhood4,.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Childhood3,.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Childhood3,.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Family,.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Family,.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mark.Bellinghaus.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mark.Bellinghaus.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC) --Delicious carbuncle (talk) 18:31, 1 October 2008 (UTC) I declare again that I am the owner of the copyright for this very image. I released the copyright before and declared this image public domain. Mmmovie (talk) 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy 96 13:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is beyond unacceptable. The tolerance of the Wikipedia community for attempting to out other users--even false attempts to do so--is at an all-time low, and therefore you are blocked indefinitely. You can request an unblock if you want. However, I should advise you that until and unless you acknowledge that your actions are wrong and you promise never, ever to attempt to out another user again, it's not likely to be successful. Blueboy 96 13:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Clairolhairrollerfrom1974.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]