User talk:Mlaffs/Archives/2010/January

Editor review archived

Since it has been well over 30 days since you requested to be reviewed, I've gone ahead and archived your request as part of my effort to cleanup Editor Review. You may view your review here. Thanks & happy editing. If you have any questions, please message me on my talk page. =D Netalarmtalk 23:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Life's Work

Excuse me, Mlaffs. I believe you analyzed my Life's Work article (about the ABC television show) and you didn't bother to evaulate it because it was missing an info box. Now that the article has had an infobox, and done some expanding since it was first created into existence three years ago, would you please re-analyze this article and give it a rating? GVnayR (talk) 04:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Actually, I wasn't involved with doing any analysis on the article at all. I added the template for the television project and noted that it was missing an infobox simply as part of a cleanup project on which I was working. I'm not sure that I'd be able to help with assigning a rating. Mlaffs (talk) 04:59, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

That's OK. I thought you were the one that would give out the rating but I guess the article can wait a little while longer to get assigned a rating. GVnayR (talk) 05:02, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Force II Radio logo.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Force II Radio logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ZooFari 04:10, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Use of the Fraction Function

Since I do not particularly like the look of the fraction created by the function, could the 1/2 be replaced by .5 instead?Juve2000 (talk) 07:17, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WCSD-LP

The article WCSD-LP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability. References merely confirm the existence of the call sign and other such details. Article was previously deleted under CSD A7, and it still does not indicate significance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

I have removed the prod template — please see Talk:WCSD-LP#Proposed_deletion for explanation. Mlaffs (talk) 18:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)