User talk:Mkpr

Mkpr, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mkpr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karyn Calabrese (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Karyn Calabrese.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:00, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Archives for sources

A quick fyi: It's bad form to remove references. If the links are no longer working you can instead tag it, remove the link being sure to keep all available information about the link, or replace the link with an archived version such as those from https://archive.org/web/ . --Ronz (talk) 21:41, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

In case it applies...

Hello, Mkpr. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 21:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

I just wanted to make sure you are aware, as it looks like you have what I hope is a minor conflict of interest.

My edits of the article have nothing to do with this, as I only noted the possibility after I was finished with the round of editing. --Ronz (talk) 23:04, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

My concern came from the photo and how you came by it to upload. --Ronz (talk) 23:39, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

I've read your talk page and you definitely have trouble articulating yourself but I think I understand what you're saying or asking. The first time I was ever at Karyn Calabrese's store (and one of the only times since), I was picking up health food stuff for my mom in December. My mom always raved about this woman named Karyn who is 67 but looks 40 or something. Well she does. I was really curious about it when I went to pick the food up, and as I'm leaving, BEYONCÉ KNOWLES WALKED IN. It was unbelievable luck. I took a picture. I think only one of two taken, and tried to read more about why Beyoncé would go to Karyn. I couldn't find a lot about Karyn so I took what I could find and consolidated into a Wikipedia page. This is the whole point and beauty of Wikipedia. Mkpr (talk) 00:29, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation.

So, care to work more on the article and learn your way around Wikipedia in the process? --Ronz (talk) 00:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2000 NBA draft may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ] history to leave the NBA talent pool worse off than it had been before a [[rookie]] draft.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/10714672/nba-2013-14-rookie-class-worst-ever|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:15, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:At Will Radio— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)