User talk:Mkhartung528

This is Mkhartung528's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anni Daulter (August 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please note source of interview pieces and listing could not demonstrate the notability of the subject. What we after is Interdependent, reliable sources that directly talk about the subject and not in merely passing mentioned.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anni Daulter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anni Daulter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mkhartung528! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:12, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anni Daulter (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by K.e.coffman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anni Daulter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anni Daulter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

K.e.coffman (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Mkhartung528. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Anni Daulter, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:07, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anni Daulter

I've worked a bit on this article and moved it over to mainspace. You might like to look through some of the changes I've made as they could help you with future articles. May I also suggest you join the Women in Red which can help you with further work on women's biographies.--Ipigott (talk) 17:05, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mary David Walgenbach has been accepted

Mary David Walgenbach, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 21:42, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mkhartung528! Thank you for your contributions. I am Rosiestep and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Rosiestep (talk) 19:38, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Agatha article

Hi Mk, you might have noticed that I expanded St. Agatha Lin last night, after you added content from that marvelous source you found. I'm so glad you found it, because it meant that I was able to remove the stub template. That's one of the things that's so fun about editing WP; we work together to find sources so that little articles can grow. I thought that the source could be better utilized, so I added information into it. I also made some formatting changes. You probably have better access to sources in general, so thanks for making this article better. See you around the 1000 Women project and around WP. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing!! I’ve discovered I love filling in the stubs! I’ve just been using google scholar, which is available to everyone! It seems like it’s a quick and easy way to find out if there are any really useful sources. Mkhartung528 (talk) 03:42, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very good. I need to use Google scholar for these saint articles. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 03:48, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]