User talk:Mkhan-95

Eritrea clubs

Where did you get that info?Calapez (talk) 02:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Hokuetsu.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Hokuetsu.gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:32, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Montserrat Secondary School

A tag has been placed on Montserrat Secondary School requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Neu_tralle 11:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Royal Montserrat Police Force FC

A tag has been placed on Royal Montserrat Police Force FC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Neu_tralle 11:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Montserrat Volcano Observatory Tremors

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Montserrat Volcano Observatory Tremors, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Club on an island with some 4,000 inhabitants (now ,used to be some 8,000), so dubious notability from the start. However, additional problem is that it is based in an abandoned city, with a ground that is no longer in use (city is empty after repeated volcanic destruction). So it seems that the info in this unsourced article is very dubious, and that the club is not noatble anyway.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:46, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ideal Printers S.C.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ideal Printers S.C., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Club on an island with some 4,000 inhabitants (now, used to be some 8,000), so dubious notability from the start. However, additional problem is that it is based in an abandoned city, with a ground that is no longer in use (city is empty after repeated volcanic destruction). So it seems that the info in this unsourced article is very dubious, and that the club is not notable anyway.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:48, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seventh Day Adventists Trendsetters

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Seventh Day Adventists Trendsetters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Club on an island with some 4,000 inhabitants (now, used to be some 8,000), so dubious notability from the start. However, additional problem is that it is based in an abandoned city, with a ground that is no longer in use (city is empty after repeated volcanic destruction). So it seems that the info in this unsourced article is very dubious, and that the club is not notable anyway.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

All other Montserrat football team articles are up for deletion as well, including the two you recreated after they were speedily deleted under another name. The Montserrat league may be worth an article, they play internationally after all, even if they are one of the two worst FIFA teams, but individual small amateur teams should not get articles solely because they compete in a very small "top level" competition. Do they have any notability? Fram (talk) 09:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cool Runnings FC

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Cool Runnings FC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable football club

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BigDunc^Talk 21:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dolphins Anguilla

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dolphins Anguilla, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable football club

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BigDunc^Talk 21:06, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of First Anguilla Trust

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article First Anguilla Trust, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable football club

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 15:59, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and dates

Hello Mkhan-95, please remember Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources and please write from the current point in time. Add a date and a source to your information. Events and subjects of once upon a time, should written as: It was a football club in 1967. The squad in 1967 was as followed. Thanx --Diwas (talk) 23:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of River Stars FC

The article River Stars FC has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited C.D.Casadeca, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jorge Núñez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What did you think about the deletion notice you received?

Hi Mkhan-95,

In November you received a message about either "Nomination for deletion" or "Proposed deletion" of an article you created. I'd like to ask you a few quick questions:

Was the message helpful? Were the instructions clear and easy to follow?
If not, how do you think the message could be improved?
What do you think about the deletion process in general? Do you understand how to contest a deletion?

You can feel free to answer on my talk page or send me your response by email (mpinchukwikimedia.org). (I won't quote you or link your answers to your username if you don't feel comfortable with that.) Your feedback is incredibly useful for improving the content of deletion notifications, so please take a minute to think about and answer these questions. Thank you! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 21:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited C.D.Agua Caliente, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadio Municipal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of C.D.Agua Caliente

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on C.D.Agua Caliente requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cloudz 679 21:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Juventus Lamas FC

The article Juventus Lamas FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned article with no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 20:11, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C.D.Real Comayagua

The article C.D.Real Comayagua has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct football club which played for one season only.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 22:02, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. When you recently edited C.D.Fuerza Aérea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadio Municipal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Juventus Lamas FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juventus Lamas FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juventus Lamas FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 22:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. When you recently edited C.D.León Libertador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Choluteca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. When you recently edited CF Villareal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Villanueva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of CF Villareal

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as CF Villareal, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Giant Snowman 17:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C.D. Boca Junior

The article C.D. Boca Junior has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Club not shown to meet WP:GNG, no indication of football-related notability either.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 13:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keren FC

The article Keren FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can't find the slightest indication that this team even exists, let alone meets our notability criteria. Checked Google, GNews, GBooks, Soccerway, and found nothing. There's no official website for the Eritrean Premier League that I can find, but reasonably reliable fansites like this one show no indication that the team is in the top league for their country.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:09, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mai Anbessa FC

The article Mai Anbessa FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I checked Google, GNews, GBooks, and Soccerway, and found nothing about this club at all. There's no official website for the Eritrean Premier League that I can find, but reasonably reliable fansites like this one show no indication that the team is in the top league for their country. This unofficial compilation of stats shows that they played in 2004/2005 and were "relegated" but that's the best I got for a source and it isn't enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:13, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denden FC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denden FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denden FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dl.thinker (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C.D. Atletico Chispa

The article C.D. Atletico Chispa has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This association football club article needs reliable source citations to verify the facts that are presented. No references with significant in-depth content about the club - insufficient to establish notability. After searching, found social media websites, but unable to find reliable sources with coverage. Article was created on 17 March 2012.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

C.D. Fuerza Aérea

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]