User talk:Mk12kn21

November 2020

Hello, I'm Awker22. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mehriban Aliyeva, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Awker22 (talk) 17:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Caucasian Albanian language, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:00, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I was going to insert that information into a different passage since that would have been more logical content-wise. Mk12kn21 (talk) 14:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lavash, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 16:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—C.Fred (talk) 16:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with those measures and the reasoning behind imposing them. I edit pages that I have knowledge in.

Mk12kn21 (talk) 18:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as I've already mentioned multiple times, there's a difference between "lavash" and "katyrma, jupka or yufka". The latter have a separate page dedicated to that specific topic. Mk12kn21 (talk) 18:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral point of view policy

I noticed your edits to Chris Sununu, which an IP editor reverted, and I recommend that you read Wikipedia's policy on neutral point of view because those edits violated it. I also recommend that you read the policy on biographies of living people. Please review the guidance in both of those policies and keep them in mind as you edit.

On a more minor note, the lead of an article should only summarize the body of the article. Lastly, you may find User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners helpful. Schazjmd (talk) 15:27, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What was written there was nothing but facts. If you personally find them offensive in any kind of way - that's you projecting your opinions on my comments and edits. My comments were in line with the Wikipedia's guidelines and policies. Mk12kn21 (talk) 15:34, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]