User talk:Mjw212

Return to Labyrinth

Hello there, I know it seems suspicious when large amounts of information are deleted from an article, but there is a reason for the deletion, as I had mentioned in the talk page. -- Annie D 22:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi- I have to say, I was kinda suprised when i checked your history and saw you had continued vandal patrolling. One thing though, a vandal who blanks pages will blank the entire page, not just one section. If it still looks suspicious, Check the discussion page at the top of the article. Someone may have good reason for blanking the page. Also, make sure to leave a template on the vandal's talk page. -Samnuva 23:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC) (Samuel Buck)[reply]

Edit

Hi. I would like to know why you reverted my edit and restored vandalism. - Rjd0060 01:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. I was just a little confused by that. - Rjd0060 01:17, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nancy Lublin citations

A tag has been placed on Nancy Lublin citations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 16:44, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Nancy Lublin citations

A tag has been placed on Nancy Lublin citations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 08:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]