User talk:Mjtruth2005

Sockpuppetry allegation

You have been mentioned in a sockpuppetry case at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rk2011. Please see instructions on how to respond to the allegations there. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 11:57, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Thomas Mesereau, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thepoliticalmaster (talk) 17:11, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Thomas Mesereau. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. SummerPhD (talk) 17:15, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Thomas Mesereau, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thepoliticalmaster (talk) 17:16, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thepoliticalmaster (talk) 17:20, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Mesereau, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thepoliticalmaster (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 17:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.