User talk:Mjohnson145

The Disability Rag
Type	Monthly or bi-monthly publishing
Founder(s)	Mary Johnson, Cass Irvin
Publisher	The Advocado Press, Inc.
Editor	Mary Johnson, Dave Matheis, Barrett Shaw, Eric Francis
Founded	1980; 44 years ago
Ceased publication	2004; 20 years ago
Headquarters	Louisville
Country	United States
Circulation	6,0000 maximum
ISSN	0749-8586
Free online archives	Archive Search
	Media of the United States; List of newspapers;

*The Disability Rag*
	[[File::File:Mastheads for The Disability Rag-Ragged Edge magazine.jpeg\|border\|frameless]] Mastheads used 1980-2003
Editor	Mary Johnson, Dave Matheis, Barrett Shaw, Eric Francis
Frequency	Monthly or bi-monthly
Circulation	6,000 maximum
Publisher	The Advocado Press, Inc.
Founder	Mary Johnson, Cass Irvin
Founded	1980; 44 years ago
Final issue	2004; 20 years ago
Country	United States
Based in	Louisville
ISSN	0749-8586

*The Disability Rag*
	File:-Ragged Edge magazine.jpeg Mastheads used 1980-2003
Frequency	Monthly or bi-monthly
Publisher	The Advocado Press, Inc.
Country	United States
Based in	Louisville
ISSN	0749-9596

This is Mjohnson145's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Disability Rag has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Disability Rag. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Disability Rag has been accepted

The Disability Rag, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 01:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Disability Rag

The "Metabox" that I think you are referring to is Template:Infobox Newspaper. Take a look at the one for the Washington Post. You certainly don't need to provide all the fields that the Washington Post does, but it is a way to put into that type of box. Nice Article.Naraht (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want me to add that infobox?Naraht (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I am just getting ready to do it. Once I have it up it would be great if you would check it and tweak it! Thanks. Mjohnson145 (talk) 20:35, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK I tried to create the following infobox but when I put it in and previewed it I got errors. Can you check my work here and add it? Thanks!

Mjohnson145 (talk) 21:28, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixing

OK, Two options above. The first using Template:Infobox Magazine, the second using Template:Infobox Newspaper. Each has its advantages and disadvantages for what you need. Comments:

The ISSN that the magazine used was wrong. the preview when I got the ISSN added complained and the 0749-9596 has the wrong check digit (See ISSN)
The templates do differ a lot, and the text on the left has to be exact. For example magazine expects lower case issn= and the newspaper upper case ISSN=
Unclear whether the maximum circulation is 6 thousand or 60 thousand.
Some of the fields, it was unclear to be which is better, for example is 1980 the founding, the date of the first issue or both. It is perfectly appropriate to include both with the same information
Start date and age template is common, but could be replaced with the start date template if you think it looks better. The Newspaper infobox recomments the "and age".
Take a look at the additional fields of the two templates at Template:Infobox Magazine, & Template:Infobox Newspaper that may help you decide what you want to add
Yes, the templates can be changed, but both are used in over 5000 pages apiece, so suggestions should go on the talk pages for the templates and be prepared for a *long* discussion before people are confident to make the changes, and let someone else make the changes, being a template editor is almost an additional level of privileges.

Naraht (talk) 21:10, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My changes

*The Disability Rag*
Editor	Mary Johnson
Former editors	Dave Matheis, Barrett Shaw, Eric Francis
Frequency	Monthly or bi-monthly
Circulation	6,000 maximum
Publisher	The Advocado Press, Inc.
Founder	Mary Johnson, Cass Irvin
First issue	1980; 44 years ago (1980)
Final issue	2004; 20 years ago (2004)
Country	United States
Based in	Louisville
ISSN	0749-8586

Thanks for the help. I think, given that the parameters are pretty much fixed for the two types, that the magazine template works better, so I took the one you'd fixed and dealt with the issues you raised and also broke down the editor section as the template indicated could be done. Weird about the ISSN. The masthead on the print issues shows the ISSN I used but I see changing it takes one to the correct link, so... whatever works. I'm going to stick this up on the page now. If you see any problems I missed please let me know. Again thanks for the help. Mjohnson145 (talk) 20:34, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the comment about firstdate vs. founded since you'd decide on one in what you had here. No clude about the ISSN, but it is impossible for an ISSN to exist with what was on the masthead, the check digit would have been wrong (0749-9690 would be valid). Naraht (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addenda: Now that it is up on the page, I notice that the bottom of the page has categories including <Magazines established in 1980>- which I clicked on and did NOT see The Rag. I assume that these category pages are automatically populated from infobox data and so eventually The Rag will show up in the appropriate categories. If this is NOT correct and I need to do something, please advise. Thanks again. Mjohnson145 (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is there in the list, but listed under "T" for "The", it is unclear to me if it should be sorted under T or D. If it should be listed under D, let me know if *all* categories should have it sorted by D or just a few. (There is a one by one change as well as an overall way to do it) They are not populated by the infobox, prior version had them as well, there are some templates that if used on a page cause the page to be in specific categories, but that doesn't apply to this one.Naraht (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Also, to show categories in text without causing the page to be in that category use a colon immediately after the second left bracket. So the text [[:Category:Roses]] shows up as Category:Roses.Naraht (talk) 21:30, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover, Disability Rag July 1981.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover, Disability Rag July 1981.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Advocado Press (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Mjohnson145/sandbox/The Advocado Press and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Mjohnson145/sandbox/The Advocado Press, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mjohnson145! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Disability Rat Tries to Ride Again.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Disability Rat Tries to Ride Again.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is being used on the page. It is linked to this sentence under the section <content>: <<The Wall Street Journal told readers about the "wheelchair-riding rodent who, irked at having his handicapped-parking space swiped, blows up the offending vehicle.">> Mjohnson145 (talk) 22:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not seeing it.

And just as an aside, any user whose name ends in "bot" is an automated program...Naraht (talk) 02:40, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you go to The Disability Rag page, search for the phrase <blows up the offending vehicle>. You will see that it is hotlinked to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Disability_Rat_Tries_to_Ride_Again.jpg - thus, this is not an orphaned image. And I realize the bot is an automated program; it is not clear to me how to 'challenge' a bot decision such as 'this will be removed by xx day' when in fact it was not orphaned. So I posted the comment here. Not sure the best place to ask questions like this. Mjohnson145 (talk) 13:30, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, linked. That's not the same as being used in the article. It needs to be used. Probably the easiest way is to simply include it in the article next to the paragraph.Naraht (talk) 15:17, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - thank you. I did not understand that distinction. I've fixed it. You have been very helpful. Mjohnson145 (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image file not orphaned (re: Orphaned non-free image File:Cover, Disability Rag July 1981.png

Re:the message <Orphaned non-free image File:Cover, Disability Rag July 1981.png>:

This image is being used on the page. It is linked to this sentence under the section <content>: <<The Wall Street Journal told readers about the "wheelchair-riding rodent who, irked at having his handicapped-parking space swiped, blows up the offending vehicle.">> I am not sure why it is being identified as an orphaned image or what I need to do to correct it. Mjohnson145 (talk) 22:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mastheads for The Disability Rag-Ragged Edge magazine.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mastheads for The Disability Rag-Ragged Edge magazine.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roland R. Griffiths

Due to your suggestion, I created a new stub, Roland R. Griffiths. Viriditas (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]