User talk:Mjiangscp

This user has publicly declared that they have a conflict of interest regarding the Wikipedia article Draft:Shore Capital Partners.

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mjiangscp! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:19, Thursday, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Mjiangscp! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:20, Thursday, January 5, 2017 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

File permission problem with File:Shore Capital Partners File-Shore Capital Partners.png

Thanks for uploading File:Shore Capital Partners File-Shore Capital Partners.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shore Capital Partners (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a clear advertisement because its sources are simply their own published and republished business announcements and there's no automatic inherited notability from that; this specifically focuses with information hoped to advertise to business partners and clients thus not what articles here are about.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shore Capital Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 17:10, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shore Capital Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shore Capital Partners. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 17:54, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shore Capital Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shore Capital Partners. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 21:45, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shore Capital Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shore Capital Partners. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:19, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shore Capital Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shore Capital Partners. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 23:28, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Shore Capital Partners File-Shore Capital Partners.png

Thank you for uploading File:Shore Capital Partners File-Shore Capital Partners.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shore Capital Partners (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Flat Out was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Announcements and passing mentions aren't enough. There simply isn't enough written about the company in secondary sources. Please see WP:CORP and take note of the comments made by the previous reviewer

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shore Capital Partners and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Flat Out (talk) 02:01, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shore Capital Partners has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shore Capital Partners. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 03:51, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]