User talk:Mjdestroyerofworlds

Go away.
— Jeremy Clarkson

Archives
Threads are archived manually in groups of 50.

1 | 2

Nomination for deletion of Template:Coast Rail Corridor

Template:Coast Rail Corridor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Park Presidio Boulevard

The article Park Presidio Boulevard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources, stub

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. p b p 02:57, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:49 Van Ness/Mission

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mission".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Future Los Angeles Metro Busway stations

A tag has been placed on Category:Future Los Angeles Metro Busway stations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Proposed new Amtrak station in Madison

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Proposed new Amtrak station in Madison, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Golden State (train)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Golden State (train), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Proposed new Amtrak station in Madison

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Proposed new Amtrak station in Madison".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Railway stations scheduled to open in 2033

A tag has been placed on Category:Railway stations scheduled to open in 2033 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		For hard, persistent work on helping to improve and fixing any breaks (including my own) on the BSicon templates for the Los Angeles Metro Rail lines. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 00:11, 24 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2033 in rail transport

A tag has been placed on Category:2033 in rail transport indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2033 in transport

A tag has been placed on Category:2033 in transport indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. Thank you for your work on Mountain View/25th Avenue station. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:27, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Former stations

On both enwiki and Commons, we use "former" categories to distinguish active stations from former stations. For railroads that don't have current passenger service, we only have Category:Former X stations and not Category:X stations. Why should KCS be the exception? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What he said; the stations haven't been "current" KCS stations in fifty years. The CPKC merger doesn't affect this. Mackensen (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: @Mackensen: Hey, this was the most populated category containing KCS stations. Go ahead and change the category name if you want, but change it in every article if you do. -MJ (talk) 21:31, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've moved all of them to the "former" category. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:45, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BLIND PEOPLE WHO CAN'T WAIK

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds,

When you tag pages for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/RFD/TFD/etc,), you shoud post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. This is done most easily by using Twinkle to tag pages for deletion. It's a very useful editing tool which makes a lot of tasks much simpler. Just make sure your Twinkle Preferences are set to "Notify page creator" and then Twinkle will post a notice any time you tag a page for deletion. I encourage you to try it out. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And the same goes for Draft:Boys are smarter then girls and Draft:Emerald the 14th planet of the milky way galaxy on the other side of darkness. Please be a courteous editor and inform your other editors that their page creations will be deleted and the reason why. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:12, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:G11

While I appreciate your trying to help, you are mistagging drafts. Please review the CSD criteria. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 09:49, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

RDT conversions

Why are you converting RDTs that used {{BS-map}} without problem to use {{Routemap}} instead? I cannot find any discussion on the matter either on the talkpages of the templates concerned, at WT:RDT, WT:RAIL or WT:UKRAIL. Besides being undiscussed, your changes are completely unnecessary, and moreover the cryptic syntax (which is not used anywhere else) makes the RDT almost unmaintainable. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) The last RfC was seven years ago; it's probably time to revisit that. I note that in the intervening years {{BS-table}} and {{Railway line header}} were deprecated and deleted, and BS-map has half as many transclusions. Mackensen (talk) 20:53, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: @Mackensen: deprecated templates are deprecated. BS-map is bulky and much less flexible than routemaps. WP:BEBOLD -MJ (talk) 06:22, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: wait, cryptic syntax? are you joking? BS-map syntax is one of the more confusing things on this site. Template:Routemap is used in over 22,000 pages - hardly "not used anywhere else" as you claim. -MJ (talk) 06:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where is {{BS-map}} deprecated? The {{routemap}} syntax is cryptic because all those double-tildes and backslashes are only used in that template, not used anywhere else in the whole of Wikipedia. They are an invention purely for that template, and I have always had immense difficulty working out how the appearance that I want should be written in that totally unintuitive syntax.

BS-map is hardly confusing, it uses uses straight Wikicode markup. If you can't handle that markup, you shouldn't be messing with templates at all.

The icons I can handle, they are the same in both templates, and are not difficult because to show e.g. File:BSicon HST.svg, I simply omit the File:BSicon and the .svg leaving HST These codes are catalogued in detail in a number of pages, here and on Commons. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 17:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have always had immense difficulty working out how the appearance that I want should be written in that totally unintuitive syntax. Personally, I was always at risk getting lost in the many pipes of BS-map and found I greatly preferred how Routemap does it, especially with the clear distinction between separating icons (backslashes) and separating text (tildes). Not having to change the numbered BS templates every time the width changed is also a plus in my book.

I sympathize that you've have difficulty mastering the syntax. I (and I suspect others) are willing to help you master it, if you're open to that approach. Maintaining a separate set of templates (with known issues) indefinitely isn't a sustainable approach. Mackensen (talk) 17:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Blue

Hi, I was referring only to the harvnb template, which requires multiple authors if they are listed in the associated citation. So this is correct: harvnb|Baxter|Adams|1999|p=55 Andy02124 (talk) 16:49, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. Thank you for your work on Miami station (Seaboard Air Line Railroad). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:51, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Attached KML/East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit

Template:Attached KML/East San Fernando Valley Light Rail Transit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:34, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Georgia Cannonball

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Georgia Cannonball, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trains operating on A-day

FYI, I also have a draft I'm working on occasionally: User:Pi.1415926535/A-Day trains. Best, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: I did some preliminary searches to see if there was a similar page somewhere, but I guess you just narrowly avoided me. It was informative to just put it all together. The problem I was contemplating going forward was how to denote that stuff like the City of Los Angeles was a the same train (from the perspective of a rider, which I think is an appropriate way to interpret what the "service" was) just operated by a different company along its route. -MJ (talk) 21:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, even reliable sources differ as to the number of "trains" operated immediately before A-Day. That's complicated by the multi-operator through trains you mention, as well as trains that operated 1, 2, 3, or 6 days a week. 366 is thrown about pretty often, while Edmonson's count that you cite is rather higher. I'll let you know when I get the list complete enough for a move to mainspace. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:44, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, Thoms has an extensive list too. Mackensen (talk) 22:50, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the actual number is less important than just explaining the operation and fates of these routes. As we've seen in the List of Eligible... Talkpage, even pretty concise lists seem to leave out things like the CWR Skunk. -MJ (talk) 23:22, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's a problem; I've yet to see a source that addresses the non-Class Is except fleetingly (like Thoms). RPSA 1970 didn't say as much, but I think it was understood that the law was only dealing with the Class Is. Even then, it was up to them to decide if their services were intercity or suburban. Flipping through the 1972 Guide, I see plenty of railroads offering tourist/local/mixed services. None of the "Service before A-Day" sources I've seen include the non-Class Is in the list. Mackensen (talk) 00:15, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PE Edendale Local Line

Hi,

Did this route served more stops than the Glendale–Burbank along their shared route ?

Arflhn (talk) 08:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Market–Frankford Line

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Market–Frankford Line, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:01, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Englewood station (Chicago and Western Indiana Railroad) has been accepted

Englewood station (Chicago and Western Indiana Railroad), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:00, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. Thank you for your work on Mojave Subdivision. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. Thank you for your work on Tunnel No. 6 (Coast Line). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:14, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Northeast Corridor Rapid Transit Project is a very good page. Well done! Kiwiz1338 (talk) 07:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New barnstar

	America's Barnstar
	Great work on editing and making new pages Tomafahe (talk) 20:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

inflation template how-to

You make a good point with this edit, and I'd like to do the same the next time I add the inflation template to an article. Did you add {{inflation year|US}} manually in source, or did you replace the entire template with some option turned on? PRRfan (talk) 16:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced it manually in source. MJ (talk) 18:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. Thank you for your work on Colorado Joint Line. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. Thank you for your work on Detroit Downtown Trolley. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Midland Branch Railroad Depot

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Midland Branch Railroad Depot, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tempate:F Line (Key System)

A tag has been placed on Tempate:F Line (Key System) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Sagotreespirit (^talk) 15:34, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

Hello Mjdestroyerofworlds!

The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overhaul of California High-Speed Rail

Hi MJ, on the talk page of the CAHSR article you called this article a "dumpster fire", and several of us agree. There is currently a collaborative effort going on to put out the fire. As it has been burning for quite a while, we see little hope in reconstructive surgery, so we are more or less building a new dumpster. Given that you recently edited a related subarticle, I wanted to invite you to have a look at the discussion/proposals. See article talk page and the work-in-progress. DracaenaGuianensis (talk) 02:29, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Route diagram template request?

Hi! I've noticed the great work you've done with creating route diagram templates for rapid transit and light rail systems. Hopefully this doesn't come off as disrespectful, but would you be willing to create a unified one including all three lines for the Vancouver SkyTrain by any chance? You're obviously way more proficient at this than I am, I've never created one completely from scratch before, let alone one for an entire rapid transit system, haha. If not, that's totally fine! I understand if you're busy with other projects on here or real life stuff. I just figured that the system was missing one. While there is already one but with all of the major routes of TransLink, and technically it could be repurposed in some form for this new template, the geometry of the system is not really shown in detail in order to fit everything on that diagram. Please let me know what you think! Thank you! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 06:38, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OrdinaryScarlett: Happy to oblige. I'll probably be able to get around to this in the next week or so. -MJ (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! On the other hand, I've noted your work on Template:Los Angeles Metro Rail lines. How would you feel about the inclusion of the maintenance and storage facilities on that particular diagram? (I also included them on each individual line template too, along with the LAX APM and the Harbor Sub ones if you wanted to give it a quick check!) OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OrdinaryScarlett: Here's this Template:SkyTrain (Vancouver) -MJ (talk) 03:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s perfect! Thank you so much! OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 03:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@OrdinaryScarlett: the only think i'm not happy with is the connector blob for the new Broadway–City Hall interchange, but that can get sorted before 2026. -MJ (talk) 03:51, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Input requested

Your input is requested in the following discussion: Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2024_April_25#Template:Skytrain_MIA. Jackdude101 ^talk ^cont 00:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Galena and Southern Wisconsin Railroad

Template:Galena and Southern Wisconsin Railroad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mackensen (talk) 01:07, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:19th Avenue/M Ocean View Project

Template:19th Avenue/M Ocean View Project has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pacific Electric Building

Template:Pacific Electric Building has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pacific Electric Trail

Template:Pacific Electric Trail has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:4 Line (Sound Transit)

Template:4 Line (Sound Transit) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PREMO light rail moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to PREMO light rail. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and without significant coverage in secondary sources it is too soon for a standalone article on this topic.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Broward Coastal Rail Link

Template:Broward Coastal Rail Link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:North San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor

Template:North San Fernando Valley Transit Corridor has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:K Line (Los Angeles Metro)/detailed

Template:K Line (Los Angeles Metro)/detailed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. OrdinaryScarlett (talk) 07:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oregon Electric Railway

Hello! Is there any reason not to place this template in Oregon Electric Railway? It looks pretty good to me. Valfontis (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it already is - it's viewable from the infobox. -MJ (talk) 14:53, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh oops, thanks. Many rail articles have them permanently expanded so I missed that. Do you happen to have a favorite source for the OE besides the Arcadia Press book? I'm surprised there doesn't seem to be a book specific to OE. I just found my Arcadia book on the Oregonian Railway and just got a pile of SP books, but I'm not sure I have the Willamette Valley Railways one. Anyway, thanks for making the route map! Valfontis (talk) 16:44, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mostly refer to old company timetables or maps to get some of the finer details, which can be found a lot on the webs. -MJ (talk) 17:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Volume 3 of Donald B. Robertson's Encyclopedia of Western Railroad History is a good starting point for all railroads in Oregon. Mackensen (talk) 21:54, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, thanks! Valfontis (talk) 23:31, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Midland Branch Railroad Depot

Hello, Mjdestroyerofworlds. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Midland Branch Railroad Depot".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of American Silver Eagle mintage figures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Silver Eagle mintage figures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Silver Eagle mintage figures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]