User talk:Mizbiplob
Mizbiplob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am An unfortunate Wikipedia user, If you can please help me.I have fallen in bored situation for editing Wikipedia.In the very beginning I knew a little about rules & regulations about wikipedia editing; I knew only how to edit; even I neevr knew what the administrator do, I had mistake in editing Wikipedia;I did some wrong edit.Then my user name was 'Mizbiplob'.Some one deleted my account;but my zeal is to write in Wikipedia, I love it.To edit opened a new account by name 'Barisal'{ though it was my colleague account, never use it),It has been deleted recently.But while this one deleted I had no wrong nooooooooooooooo wrong edit;they deleted just saying duplicate account.You see, If I want to edit then I need to create an account, but in Wikipedia is there not exist rule before deleting an account warning the user or give him chance to clarify abt himself.But they did nothing like this. You see I can't do without editing, so I opened a new account by name 'Mizbiplob1' and I found it also has been blocked .Now you give me suggestion, why should I do?If i create another account they will say duplicate account........then what the solution for editing ..................I want it.Some user is there they don't think anything ..........they only do "delete" and "block".For 5 years my account is blocked, is there anyone who will keep his eye on me with pity.I’ve got much punishment pls unblock me.I must obey the rule.Please give me a chance. Before deleting it is needed to know why he opened another account.......................let them to say ........................... You see creator created his creation;creations make many mistakes HE forgives it; But in Wikipedia ..........I said ....send to mail many administrators I said sorry,confessed my wrong for first account but I haven't got any sympathy.User of wikipedia and Wikipedia both have no sympathy !!!!!!!!!! Please give me solution how can I edit Wikipedia, if I open a new account they will delete after 2 days saying duplicate account. What a terrible situation I'm facing you ................................Please forgive me for killing your valuable time.If you can do something for me.I will be happy If it is possible to merge all account edit to "mizbiplob"Because it was my first.I'm longing for your response.Please help me. A.B.M Mizanur Rahman (talk) 10:51 am, Today (UTC−4)
Decline reason:
I'm sorry, but I have no idea what you're saying or asking. Please write a clear, understandable unblock request, following the outlines here. TNXMan 17:47, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Kakrail, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Kakrail is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Kakrail, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:40, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Pls help me to unblock my account.I got lesson much.
Mizbiplob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am An unfortunate Wikipedia user, If you can please help me.I have fallen in bored situation for editing Wikipedia.For 5 years I can’t edit.In the very beginning I knew a little about rules & regulations about wikipedia editing; I knew only how to edit; even I neevr knew what the administrator do, I had mistake in editing Wikipedia;I did some wrong edit.Then my user name was 'Mizbiplob'
Decline reason:
Is this even an unblock request? Too much disruptive editing and block evasion to even consider an unblock. --Kinu t/c 17:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Mizbiplob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 117.18.231.8 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
reblock/
Decline reason: Account is blocked directly. — Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
I am An unfortunate Wikipedia user, If you can please help me.I have fallen in bored situation for editing Wikipedia.For 5 years I can’t edit.In the very beginning I knew a little about rules & regulations about wikipedia editing; I knew only how to edit; even I neevr knew what the administrator do, I had mistake in editing Wikipedia;I did some wrong edit.Then my user name was 'Mizbiplob'
Let's Get This Straight
[edit]You were blocked for creating nonsense pages. When that block expired, you kept doing it, and were blocked again. When that block expired, you kept doing it, and got blocked again. You were finally blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. This block is on you, the person, meaning you are not permitted to edit anonymously, nor create any new accounts - doing so is considered to be evading a valid block.
The major issue that led to your blocks in the first place is that competence is required. It appears that English is not your first language - are you sure that there is not a more appropriate language Wikipedia that you can contribute to?
If you're "bored" then Wikipedia is not the right place - besides not therapy, boredom leads to the creation of non-viable articles, such as what led to your blocks in the first place.
Please list all times in the last 6 months that you edited the English Wikipedia, either anonymously, or with an account. Please explain what would you do differently in the future if you were unblocked and allowed to edit the English Wikipedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Mizbiplob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It has been passed long time i'm blocked;please unblock me A.B.M Mizanur Rahman (talk) 14:44, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Mizbiplob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
It has been passed long time i'm blocked;please unblock me
Please include a decline or accept reason.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock reviewed | 1= It has been passed long time i'm blocked;please unblock me A.B.M Mizanur Rahman
Mizbiplob (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am An unfortunate Wikipedia user, If you can please help me.I have fallen in bored situation for editing Wikipedia.In the very beginning I knew a little about rules & regulations about wikipedia editing; I knew only how to edit; even I neevr knew what the administrator do, I had mistake in editing Wikipedia;I did some wrong edit.Then my user name was 'Mizbiplob'.Some one deleted my account;but my zeal is to write in Wikipedia, I love it.To edit opened a new account by name 'Barisal'{ though it was my colleague account, never use it),It has been deleted recently.But while this one deleted I had no wrong nooooooooooooooo wrong edit;they deleted just saying duplicate account.You see, If I want to edit then I need to create an account, but in Wikipedia is there not exist rule before deleting an account warning the user or give him chance to clarify abt himself.But they did nothing like this. You see I can't do without editing, so I opened a new account by name 'Mizbiplob1' and I found it also has been blocked .Now you give me suggestion, why should I do?If i create another account they will say duplicate account........then what the solution for editing ..................I want it.Some user is there they don't think anything ..........they only do "delete" and "block".For 5 years my account is blocked, is there anyone who will keep his eye on me with pity.I’ve got much punishment pls unblock me.I must obey the rule.Please give me a chance. Before deleting it is needed to know why he opened another account.......................let them to say ........................... You see creator created his creation;creations make many mistakes HE forgives it; But in Wikipedia ..........I said ....send to mail many administrators I said sorry,confessed my wrong for first account but I haven't got any sympathy.User of wikipedia and Wikipedia both have no sympathy !!!!!!!!!! Please give me solution how can I edit Wikipedia, if I open a new account they will delete after 2 days saying duplicate account. What a terrible situation I'm facing you ................................Please forgive me for killing your valuable time.If you can do something for me.I will be happy If it is possible to merge all account edit to "mizbiplob"Because it was my first.I'm longing for your response.Please help me.
Please include a decline or accept reason.
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashkona is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashkona until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 10:04, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Pantha path
[edit]
The article Pantha path has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Run of the mill street that fails WP:GEOROAD. Unreferenced and tagged for cleanup since a sockpuppet created it seven years ago. It's a commercial street, so it gets passing mentions as an address and in directions, but searches found no substantive coverage on which to build an encyclopedia article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 19:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
The file File:Kakrail03.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused low-res personal image.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Kakrail05.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused low-res personal image.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nakhalpara Sapra Mosque for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nakhalpara Sapra Mosque is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakhalpara Sapra Mosque until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 20:45, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Nakhalpara Hossain Ali High School for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakhalpara Hossain Ali High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 00:54, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of ASM Chemical Industries for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ASM Chemical Industries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.