User talk:Miyerlokat

Proposed deletion of BitAIrt

The article BitAIrt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article, no reliable sources, no evidence of notability; cited to crypto blogs, self-sources and press releases. WP:BEFORE shows zero evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 16:58, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Gerard, please can you give me time to improve it? I am currently blocked by MER-C and thus unable to edit the page. Once unblocked, I can improve the article and if my improvements do not yield any results then you can delete it permanently. Also, you mistook it as a topic related to cryptocurrency but it is not. Please remove the cryptocurrency template from the talk page. Miyerlokat (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 17:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Miyerlokat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no intentions to promote or advertise on Wikipedia. Could you please tell me my which contribution resulted in the block? Please unblock me. I am unable to contact other editors. Miyerlokat (talk) 17:50, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How about this, this, and this (which also contains blatant falsehoods)? Huon (talk) 00:01, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of BitAIrt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BitAIrt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitAIrt until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 00:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]