User talk:Mithunkundu1983
|
August 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Yercaud has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.flickr.com/photos/mithunkundu/4852595744. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:03, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Watermarks
[edit]I have again removed the pictures you added to Lal Bagh and Yercaud. Those pictures have watermarks advertising your company, which is against our policy. Additionally, you may want to read our guidelines on conflict of interest and advertizing. Your contributions are welcome, but the images must not advertize a business. Thanks, Celestra (talk) 14:12, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mithun Kundu
[edit]A tag has been placed on Mithun Kundu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles – see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)
Minor edits
[edit]Please stop marking your edits as minor when they are not (see WP:MINOR). For example, in this edit you made a massive edit, yet marked it as minor. I have not examined your edit in detail, but a quick look makes me think that you greatly improved the article—excellent. However, the "minor" flag should not be used unless you are making a small and noncontroversial correction (such as fixing a single typo). Adding an image, or changing text, is not "minor" in the sense used at Wikipedia. Johnuniq (talk) 10:18, 30 December 2010 (UTC)