User talk:Mithrandir1967
MMUnion Ariticle
[edit]I've got no issue that the information is incomplete, or even possibly irrelevant, and I don't know who posted or re-posted the info (save for a bot that I use that thought an edit by you was vandalism); however this was a referenced source and as such was valid information. Whether or not Ramsbottom left by "mutual consent", as you put it, is not verifiable as there are no sources available. I certainly don't know if he resigned, was dismissed, or otherwise.
You go on to talk about the history of the union. Why don't you edit the article to reflect this history? I would welcome any information on the subject. In particular, the union's support for the miners strike is an important part of the union's history, but I have very limited knowledge to be searching for sources on the Internet and elsewhere. Please don't hesitate to contribute, your input is very welcome. Andy (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Please be careful when reverting vandalism that you revert back to the last good version - this edit [1] reverted one vandalistic edit but left 6 others uncorrected. Exxolon (talk) 00:46, 24 December 2008 (UTC)
In reply to your request on my talk page. Since the material relates to a living person, it comes under the WP:BLP rules, and in particular WP:GRAPEVINE requires that all unsourced material, particularly negative material, is removed. WP:3RR does not apply to such situations, as is specifically stated in both the BLP policy and the 3RR policy. There will be no sanctions against you no matter how many times you revert the material. On the contrary, the sanctions will be against the person inserting the material. This one is a bit difficult to block because the IP is dynamic but if it starts coming from a stable IP address or a registered account you can give approriate template warnings (found at WP:WARN) and if it still continues report to WP:AN3 or WP:AIV as appropriate. SpinningSpark 21:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Note regarding list
[edit]Please note that guidelines and other policies state that students should not be included unless they are notable in their own right. If you have any questions, feel free to reply here. Netalarmtalk 19:04, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
September 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding or significantly changing content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Gravesend Grammar School, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Mtking (edits) 12:04, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Admiral of the Fleet (Royal Navy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord High Admiral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Gravesend Grammar School
[edit]The name change I made was reverting an edit back to a version you created (which you then undid). I changed it as it was dubious information and an uncited name change. I have since reverted the article again back to a version created by you (See here: [2] and [3]). Best regards KiraChinmoku (T, ¤) 08:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC) I didn't change it to John Allen. Someone else did that on 8th May and I never noticed. The proper name is James A Brogden. Mithrandir1967 (talk) 09:16, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Hi. I have had to redact a number of revisions of the talk page going back to 2009, due to WP:BLP concerns. Some of your comments were swept up, I just wanted to make it clear that you are not in any way to blame. I could not remove the offending content without also removing your changes, for technical reasons. Although the history is gone I believe your comments themselves are restored. Feel free to ask e any questions about this. Guy (Help!) 23:55, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 22
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gravesend Grammar School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page QPM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Mithrandir1967. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Mithrandir1967. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)