User talk:Mitantiongrey

tapas

A cookie for you!

Thank you for pointing out my mistake. -- Rsrikanth05 (talk) 06:48, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Mitantiongrey, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Mitantiongrey! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 01:20, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Elockid's reverts of edits by User:シ シ シ

Hi. The user シ シ シ (talk · contribs) has been identified as a sockpuppet of the indefinitely blocked user GeorgianJorjadze (talk · contribs). Per Wikipedia:BAN#Edits by and on behalf of banned editors, any edits by a sock of a banned (or indefinitely blocked) user may be reverted on sight. — Richwales 08:24, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

What is going on here gentlemen? Who blocked my account and for what? who is this guy you're blaming me for? I have no idea who that Georgian guy was, i just reverted the edits on some of the articles i found contributing from that smiley guy. And there was some kind of edit war going on in one of the articles templates so i just reverted it. Ban him or whatever you want to but I am totally outraged with that sign and block on my page. Jeez. --Mitantiongrey (talk) 11:25, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

ridiculous blocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mitantiongrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Who is this Elokid that blocked me and why? for what reason?and who is that guy that he is blaming me for ? and why did he put that sign on my page? what is going on gentlemen here? i am here for contributing and here i was blocked yesterday for ridiculous reason. this blocker Elokid blames me for being someone else what is just ridiculous to blame me. i dont care who the guy was or is that you're blaming me for being him or her but i want to ask administrators and whoever manages these things here to cancel the block that was put on me by Elokid and i want apologies from that user too.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.
Suggest you read Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeorgianJorjadze before your next request.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:30, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The checkuser result (Possible) coupled with behavioral evidence means you will not be unblocked. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 22:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

In particular, your reversion here restored vandal edits by a sockpuppet シ シ シ, suggesting you are associated with that other account. Not only did you restore vandalism, but you did so by reverting the attempt of a checkuser administrator to clean it up. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:41, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

I retract the bit about vandalism. Upon further inspection, it appears that edit was constructive.

I admit I also have mixed feelings about this block. I have always disagreed with the notion that good contributions should be blanked simply because of who made the edit. A constructive contribution is a constructive contribution no matter who makes it. ~Amatulić (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Assuming people are confident that Mitantiongrey really is a sock of GeorgianJorjadze (and not simply another person who happens to have similar interests and beliefs), the Sock policy is quite clear that the account should be indefinitely blocked. As for reverting, the Banning policy says that banned editors are not to make any edits on the site, and that any good they might do is outweighed by the risks of "disruption, issues, or harm". While the assumption is that any edit by a banned editor doesn't belong and should be reverted on sight, the banning policy does envision some situations where this might not be appropriate, and it says that "Editors who reinstate edits made by a banned editor take complete responsibility for the content". — Richwales 18:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Amatulic for your understanding. I hope the administrators will find the truth and unblock me. Regards. --Mitantiongrey (talk) 12:40, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I am not that guy you're blaming me for. Jesus!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mitantiongrey (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not that guy you're blaming for. I am not Georgian joradze. I have no idea who that guy is. I just reverted some of the edits back when I saw Elokid's reverting in the Georgians infobox and then i checked out the banned guy's edits and some of his or her edits were really contributing. For example this in Bagrationi dynasty article. Georgian Americans template was also really good but Elockid deleted it. Also I think this edit was also very good and much of contributing. As for the issue why i was blocked I have no idea at all. maybe i should not have had reverted the edits of Elockid back but I am some kind of new here so maybe it's not that big deal so please unblock my account as soon as possible because i want to enrich wikipedia and want to take part as you do. Elokid made a mistake i guess so I should be unblocked. as for the Georgian Jorjazdee no comments about that because i don't know that user and i am surprised why did you put that sign on my page and blocked me unfairly. Please check my IP address and you will be sure that I am not that guy. I hope for your understanding and you will help to handle this messy situation what is now. Regards. Mitantiongrey Mitantiongrey (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, people who are using multiple accounts often deny that they are doing so, so we have to use behavioral and technical evidence as well as the words of the person in question. In this case, you appear to be the same user. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:40, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You cannot say that Elockid made a mistake: any user who simply shows up brand new and starts to re-insert the edits of a banned/blocked user certainly draws attention in a negative manner, and rightly so. This is not just a WP:DUCK block, I can guarantee that your belief that "some of his or her edits" were most definitely not really contributing. New users should not simply start re-inserting material, but should discuss changes on the article talkpage in order to ensure they're not violating recent WP:CONSENSUS. I do not find that the above unblock addresses these concerns, and shouting "I'm not a sock" might simply be a red-herring. Of course, the "methinks thou do'est protest too much" and the inappropriate phrasing of the header in this section alone makes me think WP:NOTHERE (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:01, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Elockid is a very experienced admin, so sinply stating that he has made a mistake does not work; you need to explain how this has happened. If you choose to do so, please also explain how it is that, having created an account on October 25 you are able, in less than an hour, to both create a quite detailed template with multiple photographs on it, and also, as your first article edit, delete a large chunk of text from an article in which you clearly have an abiding interest. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:21, 14 December 2012 (UTC)