User talk:Misterconginialtastical
Would You like to Help?
[edit]Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[1]]. McKinseies (talk) 17:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)== Welcome! ==
|
Do Not Fall Into The Trap!
[edit]Do not fall into the trap that many of us Jatt Sikhs do. I noticed you added Udham Singh as a Jatt Sikh. He is indeed a Kamboj Sikh http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Udham_Singh. I once thought Sardar Hari Singh Nalwa was a Jatt because his surname was Uppal. How wrong I was. He is actually a Khatri, and Uppal is originally a Khatri/Kshatriya surname. But we live and learn. Also do not add statements without references. Regards--Sikh-history (talk) 21:01, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
Yes although there are a few references which state udham singh is a jatt sandhu,and in punjab it was very easily confused with castes of upper authority jatts kambojs and arors married freely in punjab ,most kamboj and arors nowadays just refer to themself as jatt ,but yes ill agree with you source about udham singh. misterconginialtastical 19:38, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:47, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Jatt Sikh. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sikh-history (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Bhaghat Singh
[edit]Please see this article and discussion on why Bhaghat Singh was an Atheist. You are welcome to add additional references, but the WP:Consensus on this is that Bhaghat Sikh was an Atheist. Regards --Sikh-history (talk) 21:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Jatt Sikh appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Removal of legitimate sources smacks of POV. Please discuss and do not remove till there is consensus. Sikh-history (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Invite to WikiConference India 2011
[edit]Hi Misterconginialtastical,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
---|
Would You like to Help?
[edit]Hi, I am starting Wikipedia:WikiProject Ravidassia. I would like to get help from people who are interested. You may sign up for the project on the [[2]]. McKinseies (talk) 17:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)