User talk:MisterRPGnow

Bill Slavicsek

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 21:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 21:04, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check the broadcast JasperMisterRPGnow (talk) 21:07, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would not be a reliable source for something as controversial as this.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An actual broadcast of the discussion isn't reliable?MisterRPGnow (talk) 21:09, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We need more sources than that. Besides, what value does it add to the article?Jasper Deng (talk) 21:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting into an edition war debate with Sean Hannity is pretty relevant and significant. MisterRPGnow (talk) 21:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see how something like this needs such a large paragraph - it could be considered defamatory. See WP:BLP.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:19, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How is including information on a well known dispute with Hannity too large? And how is it defamatory? MisterRPGnow (talk) 21:27, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Think of the effect on this person's public relationships. The IP editor you reverted had a point with those sources being phony possibly.Jasper Deng (talk) 21:29, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 02:05, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]