User talk:Missgomez19
Article Critique
I am evaluating the education page. The history of education is fact based eliminating bias. In the section, private vs. public funding in developing countries, it seems like it leans slightly bias. By comparing and contrasting, this editor tends to lean toward one side more than the other. In this section, many of the arguments made do not include sources. Therefore, the information is not credible nor reliable. If private schools are a disadvantage to low income people, I would like to see the statistics, studies, and sources proving that otherwise it seems like the editor is only backed up by their opinion. I clicked some links to verify the credibility of the sources. A few links were broken while others came from government websites. Many of the sources were book or encyclopedia sources. I noticed a few organization websites that need to be further evaluated to determine its credibility.
Start a discussion with Missgomez19
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Missgomez19. What you say here will be public for others to see.
