User talk:Missdolly7
Welcome!
|
September 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ek Hasina Thi (TV series) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- * [[Bhuvnesh Mann as Dev Goenka
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:16, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Happy New Year (2014 film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- weekend-total-collection-1st-day-2nd-day-3rd-day-full-income-report.html|accessdate=26 October 2014}}</ref> Over-seas gross was mainly from [[United Arab Emirates]] because 40% of film was shooted in [
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Happy New Year (2014 film) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Donner60 (talk) 19:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
[edit]Is there a particular reason why you keep ignoring [1] the messages in the article that state "This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed. Please help improve it by removing unnecessary details and making it more concise." and "Wikipedia provides a plot SUMMARY not every detail. This summary exceeds the recommended MAXIMUM LENGTH, any additional details added without condensing or removing less important will be subject to IMMEDIATE REMOVAL." when you keep inserting additional plot details without removing stuff that would be less important? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- You didnt really answer my question about why, when there are several notes indicating the plot summary is already too long , you decided to add even more plot details. Did you not notice the notes? Was there something confusing so that you did not understand them? Did you think they applied to other people and not you? Were you unable to find anything that you thought was less important and so you decided to let others care of that? Understanding the cause behind the actions will help establish what methods are most effective in keeping Wikipedia from turning into a set of fanpages.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:14, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am sorry that you perceived the questions as "rude" - but it was an honest inquiry: what about the notes was ineffectual in impacting your decision to add more content? how can we prevent others from making the same potentially well intentioned mistakes that you made?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- so if you were not ignoring the note, did you not see it or did you not understand it? Do we need to make the notes bigger or jump out more or do we need to be more clear about what they mean? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you. That will help in knowing that we need to make the instructions more visible/obvious. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:31, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- so if you were not ignoring the note, did you not see it or did you not understand it? Do we need to make the notes bigger or jump out more or do we need to be more clear about what they mean? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:11, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- I am sorry that you perceived the questions as "rude" - but it was an honest inquiry: what about the notes was ineffectual in impacting your decision to add more content? how can we prevent others from making the same potentially well intentioned mistakes that you made?-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 18:53, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
As a method to really help, rather than just adding plot, you could help search through news papers and other reliably published sources to provide content from third parties about the show. See WP:WAF for more details.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:31, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
- with [2] this edit it is clear that you simply did not "did not see" the message indicating that a source was needed. Can you explain why you removed the message stating "-Do not add without providing a reliably published source" and added information without providing a source of any kind? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
We don't write our articles based on things that "are going to happen in the future" - we are neither predictors of the future nor a promotional platform to disseminate hype - we are here to collect what reliably published sources have stated about the subject. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 14:24, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 30
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian Television Academy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ayub Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Problems with upload of File:Dahleez.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Dahleez.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Preetika Rao.jpeg
[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Preetika Rao.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:PreetikaRao.jpeg
[edit]Thank you for uploading File:PreetikaRao.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Beintehaa.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Beintehaa.jpeg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Rangrasiya
- added a link pointing to Sati
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Missdolly7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)