User talk:MissMaryMack14
Welcome!
[edit]Hi MissMaryMack14! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing!
Anne Ramsay edit
[edit]I have reverted your addition of a date of birth to Anne Ramsay along with the accompanying citation to IMDb. IMDb is not a reliable source for content in Wikipedia articles. Please see WP:IMDB. You might also want to read WP:USERGENERATED to see other sources that are similarly unreliable. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for informing me about IMDB. I have used it in citing actors' appearances in films and television series. Is that allowed, even though that, too, may be user generated information? (Many, many people in that industry use publicists to create those pages.) MissMaryMack14 (talk) 20:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- That's a good question. You might want to look at Wikipedia:Citing IMDb#Appropriate uses. That section is mentioned in WP:IMDB. Apparently if the IMDb page shows "WGA" as the source of credits, use of IMDb is permitted (but then the section adds, "For both of these uses, no citations are necessary because the film itself is implied to be the primary source.").
- With regard to your parenthetical comment, does IMDb have any safeguards to ensure that pages created by publicists are not altered by other users? That would be my concern, just as on Wikipedia a conscientious editor can place reliably sourced content in an article only to have someone come along later and add unsourced content to it or alter it in some other way. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Once again, I am obliged to you for educating me on the fine points of fact editing of Wikipedia.
- I find your comments to me well supported by policy and well reasoned. It's as if I am, once again, reading court decisions in law books. Well done! And, again, thank you. MissMaryMack14 (talk) 21:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your kind words; I appreciate those comments. I began editing on Wikipedia in 2014, and I am still learning more about policies and guidelines. I'm glad to help other editors learn more when I can.
- I feel that Wikipedia editors have a responsibility to provide reliably sourced content for people who read articles on this site. Thanks for being so receptive to my comments. Eddie Blick (talk) 23:56, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
- With regard to your parenthetical comment, does IMDb have any safeguards to ensure that pages created by publicists are not altered by other users? That would be my concern, just as on Wikipedia a conscientious editor can place reliably sourced content in an article only to have someone come along later and add unsourced content to it or alter it in some other way. Eddie Blick (talk) 00:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 31
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barbara Kingsolver, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Gulf War. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]
Hi MissMaryMack14! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Diana, Princess of Wales that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 19:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. You're correct, now that I think of it. I was just moved by a fit of nostalgia, remembering Diana as a 19 year-old girl through to her untimely and horrendous death. I pity those who never experienced her magic. MissMaryMack14 (talk) 00:25, 30 October 2024 (UTC)